Research on the Effects of Different Reflective Action Models on Service Learning in Design Education

Design education focuses on developing professional talent by requiring students to gain practical experience. A key element of this training is reflective practice. In this active process, students engage in repeated cycles of reflection to assess, revise, and internalize insights as part of their learning. Reflective students enhance both self-communication and external dialogue skills, which are critical to professional growth. This research explores reflective practice in design education, where students participate in reflective cycles throughout their learning. Reflective practice here includes three models of actions: Reflection-in-Action (RiA), Reflection-on-Action (RoA), and Reflection-with-Others (RO). The study investigates how these models impact seven variables related to self-reflection (selfassessment and improvement motivation), confidence (general and communication), learning stress (uncertainty and peer interaction), and satisfaction (Part 1). It also examines whether these actions affect students' learning outcomes (effectiveness in service learning, design implementation, and execution learning) and academic performance (reflection, team, and overall scores) (Part 2). Finally, it evaluates whether reflective actions can predict students' reflective practice, learning effectiveness, and academic performance (Part 3). Results showed significant differences across variables, with all three actions impacting reflective practice, except stress and interaction with peer(SiP). Only RiA showed a significant relationship with learning outcomes, while only RO and service learning effectiveness were linked among the sub-variables. General confidence positively influenced reflection, team, and overall scores, and specific reflective actions had predictive value: RO predicted self-assessment and satisfaction; RoA predicted confidence; and RiA predicted uncertainty. In conclusion, each reflective action has unique predictive effects. Reflective action, whether during, after, or in collaboration, partially affects learning outcomes and performance. Students recognize their strengths, manage stress, and rebuild learning and communication confidence, enhancing learning satisfaction. RoA helps evaluate learning confidence, while RO aids in assessing cooperative strengths.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iciet66371.2025.11046332
Primary Topic
Educational Reforms and Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on the Effects of Different Reflective Action Models on Service Learning in Design Education

Yu Shu-Yin
5 links
Educational Reforms and Innovations
article

Research on the Effects of Different Reflective Action Models on Service Learning in Design Education

Yu Shu-Yin
article en

Abstract

Design education focuses on developing professional talent by requiring students to gain practical experience. A key element of this training is reflective practice. In this active process, students engage in repeated cycles of reflection to assess, revise, and internalize insights as part of their learning. Reflective students enhance both self-communication and external dialogue skills, which are critical to professional growth. This research explores reflective practice in design education, where students participate in reflective cycles throughout their learning. Reflective practice here includes three models of actions: Reflection-in-Action (RiA), Reflection-on-Action (RoA), and Reflection-with-Others (RO). The study investigates how these models impact seven variables related to self-reflection (selfassessment and improvement motivation), confidence (general and communication), learning stress (uncertainty and peer interaction), and satisfaction (Part 1). It also examines whether these actions affect students' learning outcomes (effectiveness in service learning, design implementation, and execution learning) and academic performance (reflection, team, and overall scores) (Part 2). Finally, it evaluates whether reflective actions can predict students' reflective practice, learning effectiveness, and academic performance (Part 3). Results showed significant differences across variables, with all three actions impacting reflective practice, except stress and interaction with peer(SiP). Only RiA showed a significant relationship with learning outcomes, while only RO and service learning effectiveness were linked among the sub-variables. General confidence positively influenced reflection, team, and overall scores, and specific reflective actions had predictive value: RO predicted self-assessment and satisfaction; RoA predicted confidence; and RiA predicted uncertainty. In conclusion, each reflective action has unique predictive effects. Reflective action, whether during, after, or in collaboration, partially affects learning outcomes and performance. Students recognize their strengths, manage stress, and rebuild learning and communication confidence, enhancing learning satisfaction. RoA helps evaluate learning confidence, while RO aids in assessing cooperative strengths.

Ming Chuan University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Educational Reforms and Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Research on the Effects of Different Reflective Action Models on Service Learning in Design Education — Yu Shu-Yin · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS