“It Must be the Resistor!” A Pilot Study Unveiling Student Debugging Misconceptions and Biases

Debugging incurs significant costs in the semiconductor industry, with some engineers spending 40% or more of their time debugging. Despite the critical importance of this skill, undergraduate students often need help to develop it. In this paper, we administered a circuit debugging test to second and third-year electrical and computer engineering (ECE) students in an introductory microelectronics class. The buggy circuit was a non-inverting amplifier printed circuit board with a misoriented op-amp. The pilot results on 26 students revealed concerns about misconceptions and biases in their debugging methodology. 54% of students focused predominantly on scrutinizing resistors, neglecting a broader exploration of potential issues. Furthermore, 46% limited their search for errors to a single potential problem, and 15% could not accurately measure resistance. Ultimately, 31% successfully identified and corrected the bug, indicating exam expectations were achievable and giving us hope that debugging skills are within reach for our students. However, specialized training may be needed to get them there.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iscas56072.2025.11043910
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“It Must be the Resistor!” A Pilot Study Unveiling Student Debugging Misconceptions and Biases

John Hu, Andrew Ash
1 citations
Education and Critical Thinking Development
8.93
article

“It Must be the Resistor!” A Pilot Study Unveiling Student Debugging Misconceptions and Biases

John Hu, Andrew Ash
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Debugging incurs significant costs in the semiconductor industry, with some engineers spending 40% or more of their time debugging. Despite the critical importance of this skill, undergraduate students often need help to develop it. In this paper, we administered a circuit debugging test to second and third-year electrical and computer engineering (ECE) students in an introductory microelectronics class. The buggy circuit was a non-inverting amplifier printed circuit board with a misoriented op-amp. The pilot results on 26 students revealed concerns about misconceptions and biases in their debugging methodology. 54% of students focused predominantly on scrutinizing resistors, neglecting a broader exploration of potential issues. Furthermore, 46% limited their search for errors to a single potential problem, and 15% could not accurately measure resistance. Ultimately, 31% successfully identified and corrected the bug, indicating exam expectations were achievable and giving us hope that debugging skills are within reach for our students. However, specialized training may be needed to get them there.

Oklahoma State University (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“It Must be the Resistor!” A Pilot Study Unveiling Student Debugging Misconceptions and Biases — John Hu, Andrew Ash · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS