Detection of Physiological Data Tampering Attacks with Quantum Machine Learning

The widespread use of cloud-based medical devices and wearable sensors has made physiological data susceptible to tampering. These attacks can compromise the reliability of healthcare systems which can be critical and life-threatening. Detection of such data tampering is of immediate need. Machine learning has been used to detect anomalies in datasets but the performance of Quantum Machine Learning (QML) is still yet to be evaluated for physiological sensor data. Thus, our study compares the effectiveness of QML for detecting physiological data tampering, focusing on two types of white-box attacks: data poisoning and adversarial perturbation. The results show that QML models are better at identifying label-flipping attacks, achieving accuracy rates of 75% − 95% depending on the data and attack severity. This superior performance is due to the ability of quantum algorithms to handle complex and high-dimensional data. However, both QML and classical models struggle to detect more sophisticated adversarial perturbation attacks, which subtly alter data without changing its statistical properties. Although QML performed poorly against this attack with around 45% − 65% accuracy, it still outperformed classical algorithms in some cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iscas56072.2025.11043495
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Quantum Information and Cryptography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detection of Physiological Data Tampering Attacks with Quantum Machine Learning

Md. Saif Hassan Onim, Himanshu Thapliyal
2 citations
Quantum Information and Cryptography
4.96
article

Detection of Physiological Data Tampering Attacks with Quantum Machine Learning

Md. Saif Hassan Onim, Himanshu Thapliyal
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The widespread use of cloud-based medical devices and wearable sensors has made physiological data susceptible to tampering. These attacks can compromise the reliability of healthcare systems which can be critical and life-threatening. Detection of such data tampering is of immediate need. Machine learning has been used to detect anomalies in datasets but the performance of Quantum Machine Learning (QML) is still yet to be evaluated for physiological sensor data. Thus, our study compares the effectiveness of QML for detecting physiological data tampering, focusing on two types of white-box attacks: data poisoning and adversarial perturbation. The results show that QML models are better at identifying label-flipping attacks, achieving accuracy rates of 75% − 95% depending on the data and attack severity. This superior performance is due to the ability of quantum algorithms to handle complex and high-dimensional data. However, both QML and classical models struggle to detect more sophisticated adversarial perturbation attacks, which subtly alter data without changing its statistical properties. Although QML performed poorly against this attack with around 45% − 65% accuracy, it still outperformed classical algorithms in some cases.

University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Quantum Information and Cryptography
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Detection of Physiological Data Tampering Attacks with Quantum Machine Learning — Md. Saif Hassan Onim, Himanshu Thapliyal · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS