JetBGC: Joint Robust Embedding and Structural Fusion Bipartite Graph Clustering

Bipartite graph clustering (BGC) has emerged as a fast-growing research in the clustering community. Despite BGC has achieved promising scalability, most variants still suffer from the following concerns: a) Susceptibility to noisy features. They construct bipartite graphs in the raw feature space, inducing poor robustness to noisy features. b) Inflexible anchor selection strategies. They usually select anchors through heuristic sampling or constrained learning methods, degrading flexibility. c) Partial structure mining. Existing methods are mainly built upon Linear Reconstruction Paradigm (LRP) from subspace clustering or Locally Linear Paradigm (LLP) from manifold learning, which partially exploit linear or locally linear structures, lacking a unified perspective to integrate global complementary structures. To this end, we propose a novel model, termed <underline xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>J</b></u>oint Robust Emb<underline xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>e</b></u>dding and Struc<underline xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>t</b></u>ural Fusion <underline xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>B</b></u>ipartite <underline xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>G</b></u>raph <underline xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>C</b></u>lustering (JetBGC), which focuses on three aspects, namely robustness, flexibility, and complementarity. Concretely, we first introduce a robust embedding learning module to extract latent representation that can reduce the impact of noisy features. Then, we optimize anchors via a constraint-free strategy that can flexibly capture data distribution. Furthermore, we revisit the consistency and specificity of LRP and LLP, and design a new unified structural fusion strategy to integrate both linear and locally linear structures from a global perspective. Therefore, JetBGC unifies robust representation learning, flexible anchor optimization, and structural bipartite graph fusion in a framework. Extensive experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets validate our effectiveness against existing baselines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tkde.2025.3583718
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Graph Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

JetBGC: Joint Robust Embedding and Structural Fusion Bipartite Graph Clustering

Yuangang Pan, Ivor W. Tsang, Xinwang Liu, Pei Zhang et al.
1 citations
IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
Advanced Graph Neural Networks
2.48
article

JetBGC: Joint Robust Embedding and Structural Fusion Bipartite Graph Clustering

Yuangang Pan, Ivor W. Tsang, Xinwang Liu, Pei Zhang, Liang Li, Junpu Zhang, Kenli Li, Keqin Li, Jie Liu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Bipartite graph clustering (BGC) has emerged as a fast-growing research in the clustering community. Despite BGC has achieved promising scalability, most variants still suffer from the following concerns: a) Susceptibility to noisy features. They construct bipartite graphs in the raw feature space, inducing poor robustness to noisy features. b) Inflexible anchor selection strategies. They usually select anchors through heuristic sampling or constrained learning methods, degrading flexibility. c) Partial structure mining. Existing methods are mainly built upon Linear Reconstruction Paradigm (LRP) from subspace clustering or Locally Linear Paradigm (LLP) from manifold learning, which partially exploit linear or locally linear structures, lacking a unified perspective to integrate global complementary structures. To this end, we propose a novel model, termed <underline xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>J</b></u>oint Robust Emb<underline xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>e</b></u>dding and Struc<underline xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>t</b></u>ural Fusion <underline xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>B</b></u>ipartite <underline xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>G</b></u>raph <underline xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>C</b></u>lustering (JetBGC), which focuses on three aspects, namely robustness, flexibility, and complementarity. Concretely, we first introduce a robust embedding learning module to extract latent representation that can reduce the impact of noisy features. Then, we optimize anchors via a constraint-free strategy that can flexibly capture data distribution. Furthermore, we revisit the consistency and specificity of LRP and LLP, and design a new unified structural fusion strategy to integrate both linear and locally linear structures from a global perspective. Therefore, JetBGC unifies robust representation learning, flexible anchor optimization, and structural bipartite graph fusion in a framework. Extensive experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets validate our effectiveness against existing baselines.

IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data EngineeringVol. 37(9)
Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG), SUNY New Paltz (US), Hunan University (CN), National University of Defense Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Advanced Graph Neural Networks
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.