Closed-Loop Neuromorphic Deep Brain Stimulation using Deep Spiking Q-Networks

Current open-loop deep brain stimulation (DBS) implants continuously apply electrical current to reduce motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, neural dynamics are patient-specific, and open-loop DBS systems are energy-inefficient as they can provide ineffective and unnecessary stimulus. Closed-loop DBS systems offer a more efficient and adaptive approach to delivering DBS. Advances in simulating biomarker responses across cortex-basal ganglia-thalamus (CBGT) networks has accelerated closed-loop DBS development. While deep learning shows promise for optimizing closed-loop stimulation, its high computational demands challenge the battery life of implanted DBS devices. Spiking neural networks (SNNs) offer an energy-efficient alternative to traditional neural networks. They benefit from the ability to take advantage of sparse activations of neurons and to transmit information as spikes. We propose a test bench for DBS parameter optimization by introducing a rat model of the CBGT network in a reinforcement learning (RL) environment and train a deep spiking Q network (DSQN) to validate an end-to-end spike model. This marks a step towards the first closed-loop benchmark with end-to-end spiking, from sensory inputs, to the model, to the stimulus outputs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iscas56072.2025.11043472
Primary Topic
Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Closed-Loop Neuromorphic Deep Brain Stimulation using Deep Spiking Q-Networks

Chunxiu Yu, Binh Thien Nguyen, Jason K. Eshraghian, Dylan Louie et al.
Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
article

Closed-Loop Neuromorphic Deep Brain Stimulation using Deep Spiking Q-Networks

Chunxiu Yu, Binh Thien Nguyen, Jason K. Eshraghian, Dylan Louie, Edward Mighetto
article en

Abstract

Current open-loop deep brain stimulation (DBS) implants continuously apply electrical current to reduce motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, neural dynamics are patient-specific, and open-loop DBS systems are energy-inefficient as they can provide ineffective and unnecessary stimulus. Closed-loop DBS systems offer a more efficient and adaptive approach to delivering DBS. Advances in simulating biomarker responses across cortex-basal ganglia-thalamus (CBGT) networks has accelerated closed-loop DBS development. While deep learning shows promise for optimizing closed-loop stimulation, its high computational demands challenge the battery life of implanted DBS devices. Spiking neural networks (SNNs) offer an energy-efficient alternative to traditional neural networks. They benefit from the ability to take advantage of sparse activations of neurons and to transmit information as spikes. We propose a test bench for DBS parameter optimization by introducing a rat model of the CBGT network in a reinforcement learning (RL) environment and train a deep spiking Q network (DSQN) to validate an end-to-end spike model. This marks a step towards the first closed-loop benchmark with end-to-end spiking, from sensory inputs, to the model, to the stimulus outputs.

Michigan Technological University (US), University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Closed-Loop Neuromorphic Deep Brain Stimulation using Deep Spiking Q-Networks — Chunxiu Yu, Binh Thien Nguyen, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS