A Responsible Framework for Assessing, Selecting, and Explaining Machine Learning Models in Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes Among People With Type 2 Diabetes: Methodology and Validation Study

This study establishes a responsible framework for assessing, selecting, and explaining machine learning models, emphasizing accuracy-fairness trade-offs in predictive modeling. Key insights include: (1) simple models perform comparably to complex ensembles; (2) models with strong accuracy may harbor substantial differences in accuracy across demographic groups; and (3) explanation methods reveal the relationships between features and risk for MI and stroke. Our results underscore the need for holistic approaches that consider accuracy, fairness, and explainability in interpretable model design and selection, potentially enhancing health care technology adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JMIR Medical Informatics
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/66200
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Responsible Framework for Assessing, Selecting, and Explaining Machine Learning Models in Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes Among People With Type 2 Diabetes: Methodology and Validation Study

Che-Yi Liao, Mary Beth Weber, Gian‐Gabriel P. Garcia, Francisco J. Pasquel et al.
4 citations
JMIR Medical Informatics
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
9.92
article

A Responsible Framework for Assessing, Selecting, and Explaining Machine Learning Models in Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes Among People With Type 2 Diabetes: Methodology and Validation Study

Che-Yi Liao, Mary Beth Weber, Gian‐Gabriel P. Garcia, Francisco J. Pasquel, Hui Shao, Esmaeil Keyvanshokooh, Yang Yang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This study establishes a responsible framework for assessing, selecting, and explaining machine learning models, emphasizing accuracy-fairness trade-offs in predictive modeling. Key insights include: (1) simple models perform comparably to complex ensembles; (2) models with strong accuracy may harbor substantial differences in accuracy across demographic groups; and (3) explanation methods reveal the relationships between features and risk for MI and stroke. Our results underscore the need for holistic approaches that consider accuracy, fairness, and explainability in interpretable model design and selection, potentially enhancing health care technology adoption.

JMIR Medical InformaticsVol. 13
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Emory University (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
9.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Responsible Framework for Assessing, Selecting, and Explaining Machine Learning Models in Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes Among People With Type 2 Diabetes: Methodology and Validation Study — Che-Yi Liao, Mary Beth Weber, et al. · JMIR Medical Informatics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS