Japan and Its Complex Position in the Nuclear Age: Moving from Vagueness to Concreteness

Although Japan has experienced the tragedy of the use of nuclear weapons during warfare in 1945, it stands as a prominent nation that has adopted a substantial reliance on nuclear weapons in its security strategy. What, then, does it mean for Japan to promote nuclear disarmament? This article sorts out the positives and negatives for Japan regarding prioritizing or deprioritizing nuclear deterrence and nuclear disarmament as part of its nuclear policy and reconfirms that whichever policy it prioritizes, there will always be a possibility of conflicting interests. To this end, Japan must take specific actions/steps to demonstrate its commitment to nuclear disarmament, including supporting the actual movement and policy of nuclear powers toward nuclear disarmament, which would contribute to reducing the value of nuclear weapons. This article looks at a case in which Japan showed opposition in a potential shift of nuclear policy of the United States toward a no first use policy and suggests that Japan’s actions may hinder the creation of an environment conducive to nuclear disarmament, thereby undermining the country’s commitment to this cause.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2025.2518764
Primary Topic
Nuclear Issues and Defense
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Japan and Its Complex Position in the Nuclear Age: Moving from Vagueness to Concreteness

Wakana Mukai
Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament
Nuclear Issues and Defense
article

Japan and Its Complex Position in the Nuclear Age: Moving from Vagueness to Concreteness

Wakana Mukai
article en

Abstract

Although Japan has experienced the tragedy of the use of nuclear weapons during warfare in 1945, it stands as a prominent nation that has adopted a substantial reliance on nuclear weapons in its security strategy. What, then, does it mean for Japan to promote nuclear disarmament? This article sorts out the positives and negatives for Japan regarding prioritizing or deprioritizing nuclear deterrence and nuclear disarmament as part of its nuclear policy and reconfirms that whichever policy it prioritizes, there will always be a possibility of conflicting interests. To this end, Japan must take specific actions/steps to demonstrate its commitment to nuclear disarmament, including supporting the actual movement and policy of nuclear powers toward nuclear disarmament, which would contribute to reducing the value of nuclear weapons. This article looks at a case in which Japan showed opposition in a potential shift of nuclear policy of the United States toward a no first use policy and suggests that Japan’s actions may hinder the creation of an environment conducive to nuclear disarmament, thereby undermining the country’s commitment to this cause.

Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament
Asia University (JP)
Nagasaki University
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Nuclear Issues and Defense
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.