Ethnobotany of Selected Philippine Indigenous Fruit Tree Species in CALABARZON, Philippines

The wealth of indigenous food resources in the Philippines is not adequately documented in published literature. Consequently, an ethnobotanical investigation was conducted to provide baseline information regarding the traditional and current uses of seven Philippine indigenous fruit tree species (IFTS) in Region IV-A (CALABARZON), namely, Katmon (Dillenia philippinensis), Bitongol (Flacourtia rukam), Kalumpit (Terminalia microcarpa), Tibig (Ficus nota), Lipote (Syzygium polycephaloides), Binayuyu (Antidesma ghaesembilla), and Libas (Spondias pinnata). The study utilized structured and key informant interviews with 264 informants selected through snowball sampling. Citations were analyzed using ethnobotanical indices: Relative Frequency of Citation (RFC), Use Reports (UR), Use Value (UV), and Informant Consensus Factor (ICF). The URs were grouped into three use-categories—dietary, medicinal, and practical—with more specific sub-categories under each. The most widely identified IFTS in the region was F. nota (RFC = 79%, UR = 145), with utilization dominated by practical purposes (UR = 78). Conversely, D. philippinensis yielded the highest UR (246) across all use-categories region-wide. Most of the UR for F. nota and D. philippinensis came from the province of Rizal. All selected IFTS, except F. nota, were primarily recognized for dietary uses, particularly as fresh fruits. Medicinal uses were cited with high consensus (ICF ≥ 0.75) for A. ghaesembilla, F. nota, and D. philippinensis. The research revealed that while some IFTS were widely recognized and utilized in specific provinces, others remain poorly known and underutilized, indicating varied levels of local knowledge. Nonetheless, the study documented the existing local importance and uses of the selected IFTS in Region IV-A.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mindanao Journal of Science and Technology
Published
2025-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61310/mjst.v23i1.2397
Primary Topic
Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethnobotany of Selected Philippine Indigenous Fruit Tree Species in CALABARZON, Philippines

Cristino Tiburan, Pastor L. Malabrigo, Dennis Marvin Santiago, Marco A. Galang et al.
Mindanao Journal of Science and Technology
Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions
article

Ethnobotany of Selected Philippine Indigenous Fruit Tree Species in CALABARZON, Philippines

Cristino Tiburan, Pastor L. Malabrigo, Dennis Marvin Santiago, Marco A. Galang, Analyn Codilan, Giorjia Mae L. Veran, Bernadeth P. Balonga, Eljohn D. Dulay
article en

Abstract

The wealth of indigenous food resources in the Philippines is not adequately documented in published literature. Consequently, an ethnobotanical investigation was conducted to provide baseline information regarding the traditional and current uses of seven Philippine indigenous fruit tree species (IFTS) in Region IV-A (CALABARZON), namely, Katmon (Dillenia philippinensis), Bitongol (Flacourtia rukam), Kalumpit (Terminalia microcarpa), Tibig (Ficus nota), Lipote (Syzygium polycephaloides), Binayuyu (Antidesma ghaesembilla), and Libas (Spondias pinnata). The study utilized structured and key informant interviews with 264 informants selected through snowball sampling. Citations were analyzed using ethnobotanical indices: Relative Frequency of Citation (RFC), Use Reports (UR), Use Value (UV), and Informant Consensus Factor (ICF). The URs were grouped into three use-categories—dietary, medicinal, and practical—with more specific sub-categories under each. The most widely identified IFTS in the region was F. nota (RFC = 79%, UR = 145), with utilization dominated by practical purposes (UR = 78). Conversely, D. philippinensis yielded the highest UR (246) across all use-categories region-wide. Most of the UR for F. nota and D. philippinensis came from the province of Rizal. All selected IFTS, except F. nota, were primarily recognized for dietary uses, particularly as fresh fruits. Medicinal uses were cited with high consensus (ICF ≥ 0.75) for A. ghaesembilla, F. nota, and D. philippinensis. The research revealed that while some IFTS were widely recognized and utilized in specific provinces, others remain poorly known and underutilized, indicating varied levels of local knowledge. Nonetheless, the study documented the existing local importance and uses of the selected IFTS in Region IV-A.

Mindanao Journal of Science and TechnologyVol. 23(1)
University of the Philippines Los Baños (PH)
Philippine Council for Agriculture, Aquatic and Natural Resources Research and Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.