Machine Learning Models Based on Enlarged Chemical Spaces for Screening Carcinogenic Chemicals

Machine learning (ML) models for screening carcinogenic chemicals are critical for the sound management of chemicals. Previous models were built on small-scale datasets and lacked applicability domain (AD) characterization that is necessary for regulatory applications of the models. In the current study, an enlarged dataset containing 1697 compounds (940 carcinogens and 757 non-carcinogens) was curated and employed to construct screening models based on 12 types of molecular fingerprints, four ML algorithms, and two graph neural networks. The AD of the optimal model was defined by a state-of-the-art characterization methodology (AD<sub>SAL</sub>) based on the analysis of structure-activity landscapes (SALs). Results showed that an optimal model based on the random forest algorithm with the PubChem fingerprints outperformed previous ones, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 86.2% on the validation set imposed with the AD<sub>SAL</sub>. The optimal model, coupled with the AD<sub>SAL</sub>, was employed to screen carcinogenic chemicals in the Inventory of Existing Chemical Substances of China (IECSC) and plastic additives datasets, identifying 1282 chemicals from the IECSC and 841 plastic additives as carcinogenic chemicals. The screening model coupled with AD<sub>SAL</sub> may serve as a promising tool for prioritizing chemicals of carcinogenic concern, facilitating the sound management of chemicals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemical Research in Toxicology
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00523
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning Models Based on Enlarged Chemical Spaces for Screening Carcinogenic Chemicals

Haobo Wang, Yuxuan Zhang, Jingwen Chen, Wenjia Liu et al.
2 citations
Chemical Research in Toxicology
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
3.01
article

Machine Learning Models Based on Enlarged Chemical Spaces for Screening Carcinogenic Chemicals

Haobo Wang, Yuxuan Zhang, Jingwen Chen, Wenjia Liu, Zhongyu Wang, Chao Wu, Z. J. Xiao
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) models for screening carcinogenic chemicals are critical for the sound management of chemicals. Previous models were built on small-scale datasets and lacked applicability domain (AD) characterization that is necessary for regulatory applications of the models. In the current study, an enlarged dataset containing 1697 compounds (940 carcinogens and 757 non-carcinogens) was curated and employed to construct screening models based on 12 types of molecular fingerprints, four ML algorithms, and two graph neural networks. The AD of the optimal model was defined by a state-of-the-art characterization methodology (AD<sub>SAL</sub>) based on the analysis of structure-activity landscapes (SALs). Results showed that an optimal model based on the random forest algorithm with the PubChem fingerprints outperformed previous ones, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 86.2% on the validation set imposed with the AD<sub>SAL</sub>. The optimal model, coupled with the AD<sub>SAL</sub>, was employed to screen carcinogenic chemicals in the Inventory of Existing Chemical Substances of China (IECSC) and plastic additives datasets, identifying 1282 chemicals from the IECSC and 841 plastic additives as carcinogenic chemicals. The screening model coupled with AD<sub>SAL</sub> may serve as a promising tool for prioritizing chemicals of carcinogenic concern, facilitating the sound management of chemicals.

Chemical Research in ToxicologyVol. 38(7)
Dalian University of Technology (CN), Center of Excellence on Hazardous Substance Management (TH)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
3.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.