The Effectiveness of Government Support Measures for Technological Sovereignty Projects

Achieving technological sovereignty is a strategic priority, and the state implements a set of support measures, but their effectiveness requires comprehensive evaluation. Based on theoretical approaches to defining technological sovereignty and criteria for evaluating effectiveness, key characteristics of existing support measures are examined. Systemic problems are identified, including insufficient coherence of the regulatory framework and goal-setting, fragmentation of instruments, functional barriers to business access to support, and limited coverage of priority sectors. Factors reducing the overall effectiveness of state policy in this area are analyzed. The potential of systematically using public-private partnership (PPP) mechanisms to address complex technological development challenges is considered as a promising direction for improving the effectiveness of support measures. The need for further adaptation of support instruments and the development of comprehensive approaches to assessing their contribution to achieving technological sovereignty is indicated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Research and Development Economics of the Firm
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12737/2306-627x-2025-14-2-54-59
Primary Topic
Innovation Policy and R&D
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effectiveness of Government Support Measures for Technological Sovereignty Projects

V. Namadov
Scientific Research and Development Economics of the Firm
Innovation Policy and R&D
article

The Effectiveness of Government Support Measures for Technological Sovereignty Projects

V. Namadov
article en

Abstract

Achieving technological sovereignty is a strategic priority, and the state implements a set of support measures, but their effectiveness requires comprehensive evaluation. Based on theoretical approaches to defining technological sovereignty and criteria for evaluating effectiveness, key characteristics of existing support measures are examined. Systemic problems are identified, including insufficient coherence of the regulatory framework and goal-setting, fragmentation of instruments, functional barriers to business access to support, and limited coverage of priority sectors. Factors reducing the overall effectiveness of state policy in this area are analyzed. The potential of systematically using public-private partnership (PPP) mechanisms to address complex technological development challenges is considered as a promising direction for improving the effectiveness of support measures. The need for further adaptation of support instruments and the development of comprehensive approaches to assessing their contribution to achieving technological sovereignty is indicated.

Scientific Research and Development Economics of the FirmVol. 14(2)
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Innovation Policy and R&D
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.