Toward a Dynamic Social Process View: An Integrative, Multidisciplinary Review of the Relationship Between Affect and Creativity

Creativity and affect (moods and emotions) are inherently and intimately connected, and management research has broadly acknowledged that affective states influence creative outcomes. Despite increasing research attention, the field lacks a systematic understanding of the affect-creativity link. Moreover, although the literature increasingly views both affect and creativity as dynamic social processes, this view is not reflected in our current understanding of their relationship. Disciplinary research silos further complicate this issue. We aim to address these concerns and provide an integrative and multidisciplinary review of the affect-creativity link, moving scholarship toward a dynamic social process view of the link. We critically examine 294 empirical studies published since 2008 across various disciplines, including organizational behavior, entrepreneurship, marketing, and psychology. We review this work along four quadrants of a 2 × 2 framework (outcome-oriented vs. process-oriented research × within-creator vs. socially oriented research) to uncover the dynamic relations between affective states and creativity, along with their profoundly social nature. We subsequently integrate this work to propose our overarching dynamic social process framework of the affect-creativity link, the creativity and affect as social processes (CASP) framework. The CASP framework emphasizes that the influence of affect on creative outcomes is mediated by three complementary pathways and best understood as a function of both affective states and creative processes under consideration. Additionally, it highlights that social factors are critical in fully understanding the reciprocal and dynamic relationship between affect and creativity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academy of Management Annals
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2023.0096
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward a Dynamic Social Process View: An Integrative, Multidisciplinary Review of the Relationship Between Affect and Creativity

Xiaoran Hu, Bernard A. Nijstad, Jonah Rösemeier
1 citations
Academy of Management Annals
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
2.12
article

Toward a Dynamic Social Process View: An Integrative, Multidisciplinary Review of the Relationship Between Affect and Creativity

Xiaoran Hu, Bernard A. Nijstad, Jonah Rösemeier
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Creativity and affect (moods and emotions) are inherently and intimately connected, and management research has broadly acknowledged that affective states influence creative outcomes. Despite increasing research attention, the field lacks a systematic understanding of the affect-creativity link. Moreover, although the literature increasingly views both affect and creativity as dynamic social processes, this view is not reflected in our current understanding of their relationship. Disciplinary research silos further complicate this issue. We aim to address these concerns and provide an integrative and multidisciplinary review of the affect-creativity link, moving scholarship toward a dynamic social process view of the link. We critically examine 294 empirical studies published since 2008 across various disciplines, including organizational behavior, entrepreneurship, marketing, and psychology. We review this work along four quadrants of a 2 × 2 framework (outcome-oriented vs. process-oriented research × within-creator vs. socially oriented research) to uncover the dynamic relations between affective states and creativity, along with their profoundly social nature. We subsequently integrate this work to propose our overarching dynamic social process framework of the affect-creativity link, the creativity and affect as social processes (CASP) framework. The CASP framework emphasizes that the influence of affect on creative outcomes is mediated by three complementary pathways and best understood as a function of both affective states and creative processes under consideration. Additionally, it highlights that social factors are critical in fully understanding the reciprocal and dynamic relationship between affect and creativity.

Academy of Management AnnalsVol. 19(2)
University of Groningen (NL), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB), Stanford University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
2.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.