Challenges for the immunoglobulin and T cell receptor gene nomenclatures in the modern genomics era

<h2>Abstract</h2> For over thirty years, an approach to the nomenclatures of human immunoglobulin (IG) and T cell receptor (TR) genes has operated successfully and has been widely supported by the research community. The principles behind the human nomenclatures were then applied to the development of nomenclatures for IG and TR genes in non-human species. More recently, however, genomic sequencing has highlighted the limitations of this historic approach to nomenclature. The sequencing of IG and TR gene loci from multiple individuals and from a number of species has unveiled an extraordinary level of structural variation within the loci of all species that have so far been studied in this way. The designated gene naming authority - the International Union of Immunological Societies (IUIS) IG and TR Nomenclature Sub-Committee - has determined that a more careful approach is required before the genes of any species are officially named. In this opinion piece, we outline the challenges of the IG and TR nomenclatures, hoping to stimulate dialogue within the research community. Such dialogue would help guide the formulation of official policies to determine the appropriate level of knowledge of a locus that should be required before official gene names can be assigned. Strategies are also presented that should allow the unambiguous reporting and discussion of IG and TR gene sequences if their official naming is delayed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ImmunoInformatics
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuno.2025.100053
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges for the immunoglobulin and T cell receptor gene nomenclatures in the modern genomics era

Yana Safonova, Luc Teyton, Andrew M. Collins, Corey T. Watson et al.
4 citations
ImmunoInformatics
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
6.50
article

Challenges for the immunoglobulin and T cell receptor gene nomenclatures in the modern genomics era

Yana Safonova, Luc Teyton, Andrew M. Collins, Corey T. Watson, Henk-Jan van den Ham, Elisa Rosati
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<h2>Abstract</h2> For over thirty years, an approach to the nomenclatures of human immunoglobulin (IG) and T cell receptor (TR) genes has operated successfully and has been widely supported by the research community. The principles behind the human nomenclatures were then applied to the development of nomenclatures for IG and TR genes in non-human species. More recently, however, genomic sequencing has highlighted the limitations of this historic approach to nomenclature. The sequencing of IG and TR gene loci from multiple individuals and from a number of species has unveiled an extraordinary level of structural variation within the loci of all species that have so far been studied in this way. The designated gene naming authority - the International Union of Immunological Societies (IUIS) IG and TR Nomenclature Sub-Committee - has determined that a more careful approach is required before the genes of any species are officially named. In this opinion piece, we outline the challenges of the IG and TR nomenclatures, hoping to stimulate dialogue within the research community. Such dialogue would help guide the formulation of official policies to determine the appropriate level of knowledge of a locus that should be required before official gene names can be assigned. Strategies are also presented that should allow the unambiguous reporting and discussion of IG and TR gene sequences if their official naming is delayed.

ImmunoInformaticsVol. 19
Pennsylvania State University (US), University of Louisville (US), Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US), UNSW Sydney (AU), Clinique Saint Pierre (BE), The Hyve (Netherlands) (NL), Scripps (United States) (US)
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
6.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.