Brief communication: Not as dirty as they look, flawed airborne and satellite snow spectra

Abstract. Key to the success of spaceborne missions is understanding snowmelt in our warming climate, as this has implications for nearly 2 billion people. An obstacle is that surface reflectance products over snow show an erroneous hook with decreases in the visible wavelengths, causing per-band and broadband reflectance errors of up to 33 % and 11 %, respectively. This hook is sometimes mistaken for soot or dust but can result from three artifacts: (1) background reflectance that is too dark, (2) an assumption of level terrain, or (3) differences in optical constants of ice. Sensor calibration and directional effects may also contribute. Solutions are being implemented.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œcryosphere
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2315-2025
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cryospheric studies and observations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Brief communication: Not as dirty as they look, flawed airborne and satellite snow spectra

Philip G. Brodrick, Niklas Bohn, David Ray Thompson, Christopher J. Crawford et al.
1 citations
˜The œcryosphere
Cryospheric studies and observations
1.30
article

Brief communication: Not as dirty as they look, flawed airborne and satellite snow spectra

Philip G. Brodrick, Niklas Bohn, David Ray Thompson, Christopher J. Crawford, Edward H. Bair, Brenton A. Wilder, Jeff Dozier, Carrie Vuyovich, Nimrod Carmon, Dar A. Roberts
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Key to the success of spaceborne missions is understanding snowmelt in our warming climate, as this has implications for nearly 2 billion people. An obstacle is that surface reflectance products over snow show an erroneous hook with decreases in the visible wavelengths, causing per-band and broadband reflectance errors of up to 33 % and 11 %, respectively. This hook is sometimes mistaken for soot or dust but can result from three artifacts: (1) background reflectance that is too dark, (2) an assumption of level terrain, or (3) differences in optical constants of ice. Sensor calibration and directional effects may also contribute. Solutions are being implemented.

˜The œcryosphereVol. 19(6)
Leidos (United States) (US), Boise State University (US), United States Geological Survey (US), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US), University of California, Santa Barbara (US), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (US), Earth Resources Observation and Science Center
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, California Institute of Technology, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, U.S. Geological Survey, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Engineer Research and Development Center, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Cryospheric studies and observations
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.