Filling the Gap: The Consequences of Collaborator Loss in Corporate R&D

We examine how collaborator loss affects the individual productivity of knowledge workers in corporate research and development (R&D). Specifically, we argue that the effect of such loss depends on whether the lost collaborator was internal or external to the organization, which may have compensatory measures in place to maintain the continuity of R&D efforts. To empirically investigate the effect of internal and external collaborator loss, we leverage 845 unexpected deaths of active inventors. We find a substantial negative effect on inventive productivity for the loss of external collaborators, particularly when the collaborator was of presumably high relevance to the remaining inventor. In contrast, the effect for the loss of internal collaborators is virtually zero. We show that the organization’s knowledge management and hiring capabilities are instrumental in explaining the muted effect of internal collaborator loss. This paper was accepted by Toby Stuart, entrepreneurship and innovation. Funding: This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Grant 329144242 and Collaborative Research Center TRR 190] and the Agencia Estatal de Investigacion [Grants CEX2019-000915-S and RYC2022-038012-I]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.03045 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Science
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.03045
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Filling the Gap: The Consequences of Collaborator Loss in Corporate R&D

Felix Poege, Fabian Gaessler, Dietmar Harhoff, Matthias Dorner et al.
3 citations
Management Science
Innovation and Knowledge Management
6.68
article

Filling the Gap: The Consequences of Collaborator Loss in Corporate R&D

Felix Poege, Fabian Gaessler, Dietmar Harhoff, Matthias Dorner, Karin Hoisl
article en
3 citations

Abstract

We examine how collaborator loss affects the individual productivity of knowledge workers in corporate research and development (R&D). Specifically, we argue that the effect of such loss depends on whether the lost collaborator was internal or external to the organization, which may have compensatory measures in place to maintain the continuity of R&D efforts. To empirically investigate the effect of internal and external collaborator loss, we leverage 845 unexpected deaths of active inventors. We find a substantial negative effect on inventive productivity for the loss of external collaborators, particularly when the collaborator was of presumably high relevance to the remaining inventor. In contrast, the effect for the loss of internal collaborators is virtually zero. We show that the organization’s knowledge management and hiring capabilities are instrumental in explaining the muted effect of internal collaborator loss. This paper was accepted by Toby Stuart, entrepreneurship and innovation. Funding: This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Grant 329144242 and Collaborative Research Center TRR 190] and the Agencia Estatal de Investigacion [Grants CEX2019-000915-S and RYC2022-038012-I]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.03045 .

Management ScienceVol. 72(2)
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), University of Mannheim (DE), Copenhagen Business School (DK), Institut für Arbeitsmarkt und Berufsforschung (DE), Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition (DE), Centre for Economic Policy Research (GB), Barcelona School of Economics (ES), Bocconi University (IT), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
6.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.