Assessing quality and biases in ethnomathematics-based numeracy worksheets: A Many-Facet Rasch Model analysis

Numeracy is a vital 21st-century skill, enabling students to solve problems relevant to socio-cultural contexts, a significance emphasized by international assessments such as PISA. Teachers can improve students' numeracy abilities by creating teaching materials that incorporate diverse activities to address daily problems through cultural lens (ethnomathematics) within a sociocultural framework. Students’ worksheets are considered effective tools for this purpose. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate numeracy learning activities in ethnomathematics-based worksheets within socio-cultural contexts using Many-Facet Rasch Model analysis. To achieve this objective, ten raters evaluated four learning activities based on five criteria: relevance, feasibility, construction and systematics, appearance, and language appropriateness. A total of 200 data points were coded in the FACETS software and subsequently analyzed. The results confirm that the worksheets meet educational quality standards in terms of both validity and reliability. Language appropriateness was the most challenging criterion for raters, whereas construction and systematics were the easiest. In addition, Rater A was the strictest, while Rater J was the most lenient. The evaluation also confirmed gender bias in Learning Activity 2 and educational background bias in Learning Activity 3.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101736
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing quality and biases in ethnomathematics-based numeracy worksheets: A Many-Facet Rasch Model analysis

Fitria Arifiyanti, Rahmi Ramadhani, Soeharto Soeharto, Rully Charitas Indra Prahmana et al.
3 citations
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
6.32
article

Assessing quality and biases in ethnomathematics-based numeracy worksheets: A Many-Facet Rasch Model analysis

Fitria Arifiyanti, Rahmi Ramadhani, Soeharto Soeharto, Rully Charitas Indra Prahmana, Zsolt Lavicza, Alfa Saleh
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Numeracy is a vital 21st-century skill, enabling students to solve problems relevant to socio-cultural contexts, a significance emphasized by international assessments such as PISA. Teachers can improve students' numeracy abilities by creating teaching materials that incorporate diverse activities to address daily problems through cultural lens (ethnomathematics) within a sociocultural framework. Students’ worksheets are considered effective tools for this purpose. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate numeracy learning activities in ethnomathematics-based worksheets within socio-cultural contexts using Many-Facet Rasch Model analysis. To achieve this objective, ten raters evaluated four learning activities based on five criteria: relevance, feasibility, construction and systematics, appearance, and language appropriateness. A total of 200 data points were coded in the FACETS software and subsequently analyzed. The results confirm that the worksheets meet educational quality standards in terms of both validity and reliability. Language appropriateness was the most challenging criterion for raters, whereas construction and systematics were the easiest. In addition, Rater A was the strictest, while Rater J was the most lenient. The evaluation also confirmed gender bias in Learning Activity 2 and educational background bias in Learning Activity 3.

Social Sciences & Humanities OpenVol. 12
Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT), Indonesia University of Education (ID), Universitas Ahmad Dahlan (ID), Samudra University (ID), Azerbaijan State University of Economics (AZ), National Research and Innovation Agency (ID)
Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional, Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
6.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.