Examining the implementation and impact of surgical guidelines in Level 4 and 5 hospitals in Kenya

Introduction: Surgical guidelines are essential for improving safety, reducing errors, and optimizing outcomes. Developed in 2009, Kenya’s national clinical guidelines aim to standardize surgical practices across healthcare facilities. However, there is limited evidence on their dissemination, adaptation, and utilization, especially in county hospitals. This study investigates the use of surgical guidelines in Kenya’s Level 4 and 5 hospitals, identifies barriers to implementation, and evaluates their impact on surgical outcomes. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study across four counties in Kenya, focusing on hospitals capable of providing emergency and specialized surgical services. Data were collected through structured, in-person interviews with surgical department heads, staff, and medical superintendents. Trend analysis of interview data was employed to examine access, training, enforcement, barriers to implementation, and impacts on surgical practices. Results: Forty-three participants from five hospitals reported that 91% had access to surgical guidelines. The World Health Organization (72%) and Ministry of Health (40%) guidelines were most commonly used, primarily covering preoperative (58%), intraoperative (44%), and postoperative (56%) care. In-person training (65%) was most common, and guidelines were credited with improved services (43%), reduced errors (38%), and enhanced infection control (28%). However, resource constraints (50%), staff attitudes (24%), and human capital shortages (15%) were significant barriers. While 76% used enforcement mechanisms, inconsistent application and resource limitations hindered effectiveness. Conclusion: Surgical guidelines are seen as valuable for improving care, but barriers such as resource limitations, poor dissemination, and inconsistent enforcement undermine their full potential. Addressing these challenges through better training, resource allocation, and leadership support is essential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Surgical Infection
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/wjsi.wjsi_1_25
Primary Topic
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the implementation and impact of surgical guidelines in Level 4 and 5 hospitals in Kenya

Peter Nthumba, Chandler Hinson, Wambui Wamburu
World Journal of Surgical Infection
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
article

Examining the implementation and impact of surgical guidelines in Level 4 and 5 hospitals in Kenya

Peter Nthumba, Chandler Hinson, Wambui Wamburu
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Surgical guidelines are essential for improving safety, reducing errors, and optimizing outcomes. Developed in 2009, Kenya’s national clinical guidelines aim to standardize surgical practices across healthcare facilities. However, there is limited evidence on their dissemination, adaptation, and utilization, especially in county hospitals. This study investigates the use of surgical guidelines in Kenya’s Level 4 and 5 hospitals, identifies barriers to implementation, and evaluates their impact on surgical outcomes. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study across four counties in Kenya, focusing on hospitals capable of providing emergency and specialized surgical services. Data were collected through structured, in-person interviews with surgical department heads, staff, and medical superintendents. Trend analysis of interview data was employed to examine access, training, enforcement, barriers to implementation, and impacts on surgical practices. Results: Forty-three participants from five hospitals reported that 91% had access to surgical guidelines. The World Health Organization (72%) and Ministry of Health (40%) guidelines were most commonly used, primarily covering preoperative (58%), intraoperative (44%), and postoperative (56%) care. In-person training (65%) was most common, and guidelines were credited with improved services (43%), reduced errors (38%), and enhanced infection control (28%). However, resource constraints (50%), staff attitudes (24%), and human capital shortages (15%) were significant barriers. While 76% used enforcement mechanisms, inconsistent application and resource limitations hindered effectiveness. Conclusion: Surgical guidelines are seen as valuable for improving care, but barriers such as resource limitations, poor dissemination, and inconsistent enforcement undermine their full potential. Addressing these challenges through better training, resource allocation, and leadership support is essential.

World Journal of Surgical InfectionVol. 4(1)
Kijabe Hospital (KE), Society of Surgical Oncology (US), University of South Alabama (US), Manchester University (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.