The impact of courtyard roof shape on adjacent building natural ventilation and passive cooling

Do all courtyard shapes perform equally? This study investigates how different roof styles impact natural ventilation and passive cooling in courtyard buildings. However, this analysis often overlooks a crucial factor: the interaction between the courtyard’s outdoor environment and the adjacent indoor spaces. Previous studies have largely concentrated on the external wind and thermal conditions, overlooking the exchange of air between the indoors and the courtyard. Addressing this research gap, the study investigates the impact of different roof styles on natural ventilation and temperature regulation within single-sided ventilated courtyard buildings. Employing Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations validated against wind tunnel experiments, the research investigates common roof configurations such as flat, dome, butterfly, parapet, Chinese curved, mansard, open gable, gambrel, shed, and reverse shed. Our results indicate that roof geometry significantly affects airflow patterns, pressure distribution, and thermal conditions, demonstrating that it can play a crucial role in enhancing or impeding natural ventilation. Notably, the streamlined design of the dome roof enhanced natural ventilation, providing 80 % higher indoor wind speed than the traditional flat roof and lowering the average indoor temperatures by up to 2.1°C. Importantly, these ventilation patterns remain consistent across varying wind directions, confirming the robustness of the findings. In contrast, the parapet roof exhibits the least effective ventilation, with the highest average indoor temperature of 26.4°C and the lowest average wind speed. The analysis underscores that not all courtyard shapes perform equally. The dome and shed roofs are identified as better designs for enhancing natural ventilation and achieving more uniform temperature distributions across the indoor spaces. • Study validates k-omega standard model for courtyard airflow with high accuracy. • Dome roofs increase indoor wind speed by 80 % over flat roofs. • Parapet roofs result in the highest indoor temps at 2.1°C higher than flat roofs. • Dome and shed roofs ensure even airflow and temperature across all indoor spaces. • Linear correlation between courtyard wind speed and volumetric airflow rate indoors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Building Engineering
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113331
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Wind and Air Flow Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of courtyard roof shape on adjacent building natural ventilation and passive cooling

John Kaiser Calautit, Carlos Jimenez-Bescos, Abdullah Dik, Hao Sun et al.
3 citations
Journal of Building Engineering
Wind and Air Flow Studies
2.40
article

The impact of courtyard roof shape on adjacent building natural ventilation and passive cooling

John Kaiser Calautit, Carlos Jimenez-Bescos, Abdullah Dik, Hao Sun, Rafik Bensalem, Zhe Wang, Zhu Tao
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Do all courtyard shapes perform equally? This study investigates how different roof styles impact natural ventilation and passive cooling in courtyard buildings. However, this analysis often overlooks a crucial factor: the interaction between the courtyard’s outdoor environment and the adjacent indoor spaces. Previous studies have largely concentrated on the external wind and thermal conditions, overlooking the exchange of air between the indoors and the courtyard. Addressing this research gap, the study investigates the impact of different roof styles on natural ventilation and temperature regulation within single-sided ventilated courtyard buildings. Employing Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations validated against wind tunnel experiments, the research investigates common roof configurations such as flat, dome, butterfly, parapet, Chinese curved, mansard, open gable, gambrel, shed, and reverse shed. Our results indicate that roof geometry significantly affects airflow patterns, pressure distribution, and thermal conditions, demonstrating that it can play a crucial role in enhancing or impeding natural ventilation. Notably, the streamlined design of the dome roof enhanced natural ventilation, providing 80 % higher indoor wind speed than the traditional flat roof and lowering the average indoor temperatures by up to 2.1°C. Importantly, these ventilation patterns remain consistent across varying wind directions, confirming the robustness of the findings. In contrast, the parapet roof exhibits the least effective ventilation, with the highest average indoor temperature of 26.4°C and the lowest average wind speed. The analysis underscores that not all courtyard shapes perform equally. The dome and shed roofs are identified as better designs for enhancing natural ventilation and achieving more uniform temperature distributions across the indoor spaces. • Study validates k-omega standard model for courtyard airflow with high accuracy. • Dome roofs increase indoor wind speed by 80 % over flat roofs. • Parapet roofs result in the highest indoor temps at 2.1°C higher than flat roofs. • Dome and shed roofs ensure even airflow and temperature across all indoor spaces. • Linear correlation between courtyard wind speed and volumetric airflow rate indoors.

Journal of Building EngineeringVol. 111
University of Nottingham (GB), Laboratoire d'Analyse et d'Architecture des Systèmes (FR), University of Derby (GB), École Nationale Supérieure d'Architecture de Toulouse (FR), İskenderun Technical University (TR), University of Westminster (GB)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Wind and Air Flow Studies
2.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.