Traumatic fractures of the sternum – typical distribution and need for subgroups within AO and OTA classification system?

Objective of this study is the morphologic validation of the AO-classification of the sternal bone and particularly define subgroups. Analyzed were all patients of a level I trauma center of a 7-year period with fractures of the sternal bone and the anterior rib cartilage. A total number of n = 124 patients was included. The detailed evaluation of the CT-data recorded anatomical basic data of the rib cage and every fracture with its position, dislocation, fracture pattern (which was classified following the AO). 116 (93.5%) patients showed 134 single fractures of the sternal bone, 48 (35.8%) of the manubrium, 81 (60.4%) of the corpus sterni and 5 (3.7%) of the xyphoid. 16 patients had a dual fracture of manubrium and corpus. Fractures of the corpus were mostly type A-fractures, followed by type B-and C-fractures. Manubrial fractures had the same number of type A- and B-fractures. Subgroups were theoretically defined by the senior author of our group and validated. based on location, dislocation and course of the fracture. Sternal fractures are mostly shown at the corpus. Fractures of the xiphoid are very uncommon. Generally, corpus fractures are simple fractures, the rarer manubrium fractures show more complex fractures, which presumes a high trauma energy. The defined subgroups can help draw conclusion to the trauma mechanism and its potential concomitant injuries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-025-02910-x
Primary Topic
Trauma Management and Diagnosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Traumatic fractures of the sternum – typical distribution and need for subgroups within AO and OTA classification system?

Johannes Krause, Stefan Schulz-Drost, Mario Perl, Florian Kern et al.
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
Trauma Management and Diagnosis
article

Traumatic fractures of the sternum – typical distribution and need for subgroups within AO and OTA classification system?

Johannes Krause, Stefan Schulz-Drost, Mario Perl, Florian Kern, Johannes Groh, Anne Schenderlein
article en

Abstract

Objective of this study is the morphologic validation of the AO-classification of the sternal bone and particularly define subgroups. Analyzed were all patients of a level I trauma center of a 7-year period with fractures of the sternal bone and the anterior rib cartilage. A total number of n = 124 patients was included. The detailed evaluation of the CT-data recorded anatomical basic data of the rib cage and every fracture with its position, dislocation, fracture pattern (which was classified following the AO). 116 (93.5%) patients showed 134 single fractures of the sternal bone, 48 (35.8%) of the manubrium, 81 (60.4%) of the corpus sterni and 5 (3.7%) of the xyphoid. 16 patients had a dual fracture of manubrium and corpus. Fractures of the corpus were mostly type A-fractures, followed by type B-and C-fractures. Manubrial fractures had the same number of type A- and B-fractures. Subgroups were theoretically defined by the senior author of our group and validated. based on location, dislocation and course of the fracture. Sternal fractures are mostly shown at the corpus. Fractures of the xiphoid are very uncommon. Generally, corpus fractures are simple fractures, the rarer manubrium fractures show more complex fractures, which presumes a high trauma energy. The defined subgroups can help draw conclusion to the trauma mechanism and its potential concomitant injuries.

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency SurgeryVol. 51(1)
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE), Helios Hospital Schwerin (DE)
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Trauma Management and Diagnosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.