Myocardial protection in adult cardiac surgery: A comparative analysis of del nido versus St. Thomas cardioplegia

ABSTRACT Background: Myocardial protection is critical in cardiac surgery, and the choice of cardioplegia significantly influences the outcomes. Del Nido (DN) and St. Thomas (ST) cardioplegia are widely used, but their comparative efficacy in adult cardiac surgery remains under evaluation. This study compares DN and ST cardioplegia regarding postoperative circulatory support, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and hospital outcomes. Methods: This prospective study was conducted at the Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery. Sixty-six adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and valve surgeries were analyzed and equally divided into DN and ST groups. The key variables, including cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, aortic cross-clamp (AXC) time, vasoactive inotropic score (VIS), mechanical ventilation duration, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and hospital stay, were compared between the groups. Results: A total of 66 patients were analyzed, with 33 in each cardioplegia group. There were no statistically significant differences between the DN and ST groups in CPB time (173.3 ± 97.65 min vs. 132.9 ± 65.6 min, P > 0.05), AXC time (134.3 ± 68.3 min vs. 107 ± 55.8 min, P = 0.136), VIS (15.3 ± 8.6 vs. 12.18 ± 7.3, P = 0.211), mechanical ventilation duration (6.23 ± 2.29 h vs. 5.77 ± 1.78 h, P > 0.05), ICU stay (5.88 ± 2.03 days vs. 6.32 ± 2.36 days, P > 0.05), and total hospital stay (10.34 ± 3.13 days vs. 10.59 ± 3.01 days, P > 0.05). However, the DN group demonstrated significantly better postoperative LVEF (54.69% ±6.08% vs. 50.44 ± 6.56%, P = 0.006), suggesting superior myocardial preservation. In-hospital mortality was similar in both groups (3% each, P > 0.05). Conclusion: Both DN and ST cardioplegia provided comparable myocardial protection and clinical outcomes. However, DN was associated with a significantly higher postoperative LVEF, indicating potential advantages in myocardial preservation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heart India
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/heartindia.heartindia_3_25
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Myocardial protection in adult cardiac surgery: A comparative analysis of del nido versus St. Thomas cardioplegia

Shahnawaz Bashir, M. Khurshid, Farooq Ahmad Ganie, Zubair Ashraf Hakeem et al.
1 citations
Heart India
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
1.39
article

Myocardial protection in adult cardiac surgery: A comparative analysis of del nido versus St. Thomas cardioplegia

Shahnawaz Bashir, M. Khurshid, Farooq Ahmad Ganie, Zubair Ashraf Hakeem, Naiem Ahrar, Abid Kangoo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: Myocardial protection is critical in cardiac surgery, and the choice of cardioplegia significantly influences the outcomes. Del Nido (DN) and St. Thomas (ST) cardioplegia are widely used, but their comparative efficacy in adult cardiac surgery remains under evaluation. This study compares DN and ST cardioplegia regarding postoperative circulatory support, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and hospital outcomes. Methods: This prospective study was conducted at the Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery. Sixty-six adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and valve surgeries were analyzed and equally divided into DN and ST groups. The key variables, including cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, aortic cross-clamp (AXC) time, vasoactive inotropic score (VIS), mechanical ventilation duration, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and hospital stay, were compared between the groups. Results: A total of 66 patients were analyzed, with 33 in each cardioplegia group. There were no statistically significant differences between the DN and ST groups in CPB time (173.3 ± 97.65 min vs. 132.9 ± 65.6 min, P > 0.05), AXC time (134.3 ± 68.3 min vs. 107 ± 55.8 min, P = 0.136), VIS (15.3 ± 8.6 vs. 12.18 ± 7.3, P = 0.211), mechanical ventilation duration (6.23 ± 2.29 h vs. 5.77 ± 1.78 h, P > 0.05), ICU stay (5.88 ± 2.03 days vs. 6.32 ± 2.36 days, P > 0.05), and total hospital stay (10.34 ± 3.13 days vs. 10.59 ± 3.01 days, P > 0.05). However, the DN group demonstrated significantly better postoperative LVEF (54.69% ±6.08% vs. 50.44 ± 6.56%, P = 0.006), suggesting superior myocardial preservation. In-hospital mortality was similar in both groups (3% each, P > 0.05). Conclusion: Both DN and ST cardioplegia provided comparable myocardial protection and clinical outcomes. However, DN was associated with a significantly higher postoperative LVEF, indicating potential advantages in myocardial preservation.

Heart IndiaVol. 13(2)
Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.