TROPATIVE CONSTRUCTIONS IN SLAVIC MICROLANGUAGES: NATURAL AND CONSTRUCTED FEATURES

This article is dedicated to means and strategies used to express tropative (a meaning ‘X considers Y to be Z’) in Slavic microlanguages, i.e. ethnolects possessing their own norm, different from those of standard languages and occupying a middle ground between natural and constructed languages. The sample of 10 microlanguages is subdivided into two halves: five authorial literature projects based on varieties of a particular area and five authorless regional ethnolects in order to compare the results for these two groups. Data were received from a short survey of language speakers, (co-) authors or users. The research has shown that these two types of microlanguages use totally different constructions. The results of the research contribute both to typology of tropative and for cross-category typology (typology of languages of different origin) in general.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Филолог – часопис за језик књижевност и културу
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21618/fil2531370t
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
20.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

TROPATIVE CONSTRUCTIONS IN SLAVIC MICROLANGUAGES: NATURAL AND CONSTRUCTED FEATURES

Roman Viktorovich Tarasov
2 citations
Филолог – часопис за језик књижевност и културу
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
20.85
article

TROPATIVE CONSTRUCTIONS IN SLAVIC MICROLANGUAGES: NATURAL AND CONSTRUCTED FEATURES

Roman Viktorovich Tarasov
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This article is dedicated to means and strategies used to express tropative (a meaning ‘X considers Y to be Z’) in Slavic microlanguages, i.e. ethnolects possessing their own norm, different from those of standard languages and occupying a middle ground between natural and constructed languages. The sample of 10 microlanguages is subdivided into two halves: five authorial literature projects based on varieties of a particular area and five authorless regional ethnolects in order to compare the results for these two groups. Data were received from a short survey of language speakers, (co-) authors or users. The research has shown that these two types of microlanguages use totally different constructions. The results of the research contribute both to typology of tropative and for cross-category typology (typology of languages of different origin) in general.

Филолог – часопис за језик књижевност и културуVol. 16(31)
Kazan Federal University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
20.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.