Constraints on the ejecting-crust activity model on comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko

ABSTRACT Reproducing the observed activity of comets with thermophysical models remains a primary challenge of cometary science. We use a pebble-based thermophysical model of gas-pressure build-up in the subsurface to reproduce the global emission rates of dust, water, ${\rm CO}_{2}$, and CO observed by Rosetta at comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko (hereafter 67P). For sufficiently low diffusivities, the low tensile strength is overcome, leading to the ejection of ${\sim}$millimetre- to decimetre-sized dust particles as well as roughly the correct outgassing rates. All the ejections, and thus the bulk of the outgassing, come from the Southern hemisphere during the time that it is strongly illuminated at perihelion. This leads to a ‘blow-off’ of the dust-crust that otherwise forms: volatiles are much closer to the surface in the south (within the top centimetre) than in the north (10 or more cm deep), naturally explaining the strong southern water outgassing expected from 67P’s non-gravitational accelerations and torques. We find that low gas diffusivity, as well as large heat capacity and steeply decreasing tensile strength with depth or ice content, is in best agreement with the outgassing data. However, even in these cases, we struggle not to exceed the observed emission rates of dust, ${\rm CO}_{2}$, and CO. In the south, it is difficult for models to achieve a balance between triggering activity and generating too much of it (with ${\rm CO}_{2}$ the critical driving species here), while in the north, it remains challenging to generate activity at all. Strong constraints are placed on the nature of the activity mechanism by the location of dust ejection and erosion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf1040
Primary Topic
Astro and Planetary Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constraints on the ejecting-crust activity model on comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko

Christian Schuckart, Dorothea Bischoff, P. J. Gutiérrez, Nicholas O. Attree et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Astro and Planetary Science
article

Constraints on the ejecting-crust activity model on comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko

Christian Schuckart, Dorothea Bischoff, P. J. Gutiérrez, Nicholas O. Attree, Jürgen Blum, Bastian Gundlach, Johannes Markkanen, Yong Xin, Yury V. Skorov
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Reproducing the observed activity of comets with thermophysical models remains a primary challenge of cometary science. We use a pebble-based thermophysical model of gas-pressure build-up in the subsurface to reproduce the global emission rates of dust, water, ${\rm CO}_{2}$, and CO observed by Rosetta at comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko (hereafter 67P). For sufficiently low diffusivities, the low tensile strength is overcome, leading to the ejection of ${\sim}$millimetre- to decimetre-sized dust particles as well as roughly the correct outgassing rates. All the ejections, and thus the bulk of the outgassing, come from the Southern hemisphere during the time that it is strongly illuminated at perihelion. This leads to a ‘blow-off’ of the dust-crust that otherwise forms: volatiles are much closer to the surface in the south (within the top centimetre) than in the north (10 or more cm deep), naturally explaining the strong southern water outgassing expected from 67P’s non-gravitational accelerations and torques. We find that low gas diffusivity, as well as large heat capacity and steeply decreasing tensile strength with depth or ice content, is in best agreement with the outgassing data. However, even in these cases, we struggle not to exceed the observed emission rates of dust, ${\rm CO}_{2}$, and CO. In the south, it is difficult for models to achieve a balance between triggering activity and generating too much of it (with ${\rm CO}_{2}$ the critical driving species here), while in the north, it remains challenging to generate activity at all. Strong constraints are placed on the nature of the activity mechanism by the location of dust ejection and erosion.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyVol. 541(2)
University of Science and Technology of China (CN), University of Münster (DE), Purple Mountain Observatory (CN), Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research (DE), Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (ES), Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Astro and Planetary Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.