Mapping forest management regimes in Europe

Forests provide a multitude of ecosystem services, such as wood provisioning, carbon sequestration, biodiversity conservation, and cultural value. Numerous European Union (EU) policies introduce diverse goals for forests, leading to inherent trade-offs when balancing different forest functions and targets. Effective planning is crucial for optimizing such trade-offs across Europe. This requires an understanding of the current spatial distribution of forest management regimes. However, the mapping of European forest management regimes is challenging due to the limited availability of comprehensive, harmonized data. This study aimed to produce a high-resolution forest management map for Europe by integrating the most recent spatial forest datasets from multiple sources available in the literature. Our integrated map depicts the spatial distribution of five forest management classes with different objectives, highlighting distinct regional patterns across the continent. Western Europe predominantly features close-to-nature forestry and combined objective forestry , whereas Northern Europe is characterized primarily by intensive forestry . Southern and Eastern Europe exhibit a more varied distribution, with combined objective forestry emerging as the most prevalent forest management class. Unmanaged forests are mostly found in Northern Europe and very intensive forestry in Portugal, Galicia, and Gascony. Comparison with National Forest Inventory data provides insight into the overlaps between European scale patterns from the mapping exercise and plot-level observations. This comprehensive map offers a valuable basis for policy decisions, supporting the EU's climate mitigation objectives and improving the understanding of forest management regimes across Europe. • Intensive forestry and unmanaged forests are most present in Northern Europe. • Close-to-nature forestry is mostly found in mountain regions and Western Europe. • Southern Europe has the highest share of very intensive forestry in Europe. • Combined objective forestry is dominant in Eastern, Southern and Western Europe. • High-resolution forest management map produced, consistent with plot-level data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forest Ecology and Management
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122940
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping forest management regimes in Europe

Peter H. Verburg, Thales A. P. West, Patricia Adame, Niels Debonne et al.
14 citations
Forest Ecology and Management
Forest Management and Policy
15.47
article

Mapping forest management regimes in Europe

Peter H. Verburg, Thales A. P. West, Patricia Adame, Niels Debonne, Rasmus Astrup, Niek Scherpenhuijzen, Saskia Oostdijk
article en
14 citations

Abstract

Forests provide a multitude of ecosystem services, such as wood provisioning, carbon sequestration, biodiversity conservation, and cultural value. Numerous European Union (EU) policies introduce diverse goals for forests, leading to inherent trade-offs when balancing different forest functions and targets. Effective planning is crucial for optimizing such trade-offs across Europe. This requires an understanding of the current spatial distribution of forest management regimes. However, the mapping of European forest management regimes is challenging due to the limited availability of comprehensive, harmonized data. This study aimed to produce a high-resolution forest management map for Europe by integrating the most recent spatial forest datasets from multiple sources available in the literature. Our integrated map depicts the spatial distribution of five forest management classes with different objectives, highlighting distinct regional patterns across the continent. Western Europe predominantly features close-to-nature forestry and combined objective forestry , whereas Northern Europe is characterized primarily by intensive forestry . Southern and Eastern Europe exhibit a more varied distribution, with combined objective forestry emerging as the most prevalent forest management class. Unmanaged forests are mostly found in Northern Europe and very intensive forestry in Portugal, Galicia, and Gascony. Comparison with National Forest Inventory data provides insight into the overlaps between European scale patterns from the mapping exercise and plot-level observations. This comprehensive map offers a valuable basis for policy decisions, supporting the EU's climate mitigation objectives and improving the understanding of forest management regimes across Europe. • Intensive forestry and unmanaged forests are most present in Northern Europe. • Close-to-nature forestry is mostly found in mountain regions and Western Europe. • Southern Europe has the highest share of very intensive forestry in Europe. • Combined objective forestry is dominant in Eastern, Southern and Western Europe. • High-resolution forest management map produced, consistent with plot-level data.

Forest Ecology and ManagementVol. 594
Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology (ES), Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NO), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Forest Management and Policy
15.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.