Reading Dante with George Eliot and Co.

Abstract This short article approaches intertextuality as a network, as a form of ‘reading with’ and in company which is inevitably complex, mediated and fragmentary. It takes as its primary example a chapter from George Eliot’s last novel Daniel Deronda (1876) in which Dante is explicitly present: on the one hand, as the words for a song from Gioachino Rossini’s opera Otello (1816); on the other, via a paraphrase by Alfred, Lord Tennyson placed as the chapter’s epigraph. This example confirms Caroline Levine’s argument about transnational ‘networks allow[ing] us to reconceive what is proper to Victorian literature’, so as to include Dante, for example (Levine, ‘From Nation to Network’, Victorian Studies, 55.4 (2013), 647–66 (p. 664)). Yet it also raises vital and even worrying questions about the canon as a network, about the presence and role of fragmentation and about an overreliance on authors and authorship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forum for Modern Language Studies
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/fmls/cqaf025
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Modernist Literature and Criticism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reading Dante with George Eliot and Co.

Jennifer Rushworth
1 citations
Forum for Modern Language Studies
Modernist Literature and Criticism
15.18
article

Reading Dante with George Eliot and Co.

Jennifer Rushworth
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This short article approaches intertextuality as a network, as a form of ‘reading with’ and in company which is inevitably complex, mediated and fragmentary. It takes as its primary example a chapter from George Eliot’s last novel Daniel Deronda (1876) in which Dante is explicitly present: on the one hand, as the words for a song from Gioachino Rossini’s opera Otello (1816); on the other, via a paraphrase by Alfred, Lord Tennyson placed as the chapter’s epigraph. This example confirms Caroline Levine’s argument about transnational ‘networks allow[ing] us to reconceive what is proper to Victorian literature’, so as to include Dante, for example (Levine, ‘From Nation to Network’, Victorian Studies, 55.4 (2013), 647–66 (p. 664)). Yet it also raises vital and even worrying questions about the canon as a network, about the presence and role of fragmentation and about an overreliance on authors and authorship.

Forum for Modern Language StudiesVol. 61(2)
University College London (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Modernist Literature and Criticism
15.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.