Risk of Problematic Internet Use According to Dominant Handedness in Adolescents

Objective: To investigate whether left or right-handedness influences adolescents’ risk of problematic internet use (PIU). Methods: The study conducted with Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University students utilized a cross-sectional method. A self-reported questionnaire was completed by the participants regarding demographics. To ascertain the dominant hand and evaluate the extent of problematic internet usage (PIU), the short version of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI) and Young’s internet addiction test (IAT) were used. Young’s IAT scores were analyzed according to handedness and in between left-handers. Results: The questionnaires were filled out by 1186 university students aged 18-21. The rate of left-handedness was 10.5%, which was more common in males than females (12.6% vs. 9.5%, p < .01). The IAT score of the left-handed males was 37.02±24.02, while the score of the left-handed female was 32.74±16.74 (p < .05). The overall prevalence of PIU was 18.8%. Males also had higher IAT scores (p < .05). There was no difference in test scores based on the dominant hand (p > .05). The risk of problematic internet use increased by 1.42 times more for males (p > .05 and p < .05, 95% CI: 1.04–1.94, respectively). Conclusion: Adolescents’ PIU cannot be predicted by their dominant hand. However, male left-handers are more prone to PIU behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.1315112
Primary Topic
Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk of Problematic Internet Use According to Dominant Handedness in Adolescents

Nazan Kaymaz, İbrahim Ender Ekin
Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences
Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
article

Risk of Problematic Internet Use According to Dominant Handedness in Adolescents

Nazan Kaymaz, İbrahim Ender Ekin
article en

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether left or right-handedness influences adolescents’ risk of problematic internet use (PIU). Methods: The study conducted with Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University students utilized a cross-sectional method. A self-reported questionnaire was completed by the participants regarding demographics. To ascertain the dominant hand and evaluate the extent of problematic internet usage (PIU), the short version of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI) and Young’s internet addiction test (IAT) were used. Young’s IAT scores were analyzed according to handedness and in between left-handers. Results: The questionnaires were filled out by 1186 university students aged 18-21. The rate of left-handedness was 10.5%, which was more common in males than females (12.6% vs. 9.5%, p < .01). The IAT score of the left-handed males was 37.02±24.02, while the score of the left-handed female was 32.74±16.74 (p < .05). The overall prevalence of PIU was 18.8%. Males also had higher IAT scores (p < .05). There was no difference in test scores based on the dominant hand (p > .05). The risk of problematic internet use increased by 1.42 times more for males (p > .05 and p < .05, 95% CI: 1.04–1.94, respectively). Conclusion: Adolescents’ PIU cannot be predicted by their dominant hand. However, male left-handers are more prone to PIU behavior.

Clinical and Experimental Health SciencesVol. 15(2)
Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi (TR)
Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.