TGF-β Determines the Pro-migratory Potential of bFGF Signaling in Medulloblastoma

The editors have identified the duplication of Western blot data in Figures 5 and6 of this article.After reviewing the matter with the authors, it was agreed that this duplication was unintentional and resulted from an oversight during manuscript preparation.The authors have acknowledged that some panels may have been assembled incorrectly and that the pERK panel in 6E was duplicated by error.The authors have provided clarification for all issues raised, which confirms that the scientific conclusions of the article remain unaffected.As a correction, the following changes were made: Figure 5H, which contained a potential duplication of blots shown in Figure 5A, and Figure 5G was replaced with Western blot data previously shown in Figure S6H. FRS2 panels in Figure 6B were replaced by immunoblots showing FRS2 input of the same experiments. The duplicated panel appearing in Figure 6E was replaced by the correct panels of the same experimental series.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cell Reports
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115996
Primary Topic
TGF-β signaling in diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

TGF-β Determines the Pro-migratory Potential of bFGF Signaling in Medulloblastoma

Ana Guerreiro Stücklin, Martin Baumgartner, Michael A. Grotzer, Dimitra Tripolitsioti et al.
Cell Reports
TGF-β signaling in diseases
article

TGF-β Determines the Pro-migratory Potential of bFGF Signaling in Medulloblastoma

Ana Guerreiro Stücklin, Martin Baumgartner, Michael A. Grotzer, Dimitra Tripolitsioti, Lena Behrmann, Anuja Neve, Claudia M. Kuzan-Fischer, Daniel S. Kirschenbaum, Elisabeth J. Rushing, Michael D. Taylor, Karthiga Santhana Kumar
article en

Abstract

The editors have identified the duplication of Western blot data in Figures 5 and6 of this article.After reviewing the matter with the authors, it was agreed that this duplication was unintentional and resulted from an oversight during manuscript preparation.The authors have acknowledged that some panels may have been assembled incorrectly and that the pERK panel in 6E was duplicated by error.The authors have provided clarification for all issues raised, which confirms that the scientific conclusions of the article remain unaffected.As a correction, the following changes were made: Figure 5H, which contained a potential duplication of blots shown in Figure 5A, and Figure 5G was replaced with Western blot data previously shown in Figure S6H. FRS2 panels in Figure 6B were replaced by immunoblots showing FRS2 input of the same experiments. The duplicated panel appearing in Figure 6E was replaced by the correct panels of the same experimental series.

Cell ReportsVol. 44(7)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
TGF-β signaling in diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.