Evaluation of Accuracy of Intraoral Scanner with Different Inlay Preparation Geometry

Objective: This in vitro study aimed to assess the accuracy of an intraoral scanner in inlay preparations with different geometry. Methods: The upper second premolar tooth-shaped models were designed and prepared using a 3D printer (Phrozen Mega 8K, Phrozen, Taiwan). Three distinct inlay preparation configurations were utilized, including buccal and palatal wall divergence at 6°, 8°, and 10°. The reference 3D images were acquired through scanning of each model with varying inlay preparation using an extraoral scanner (E1, 3Shape, Denmark). Thirty 3D images (samples) were obtained from each of the three models (n = 10) using an intraoral scanner (Trios 3, 3Shape, Denmark). The samples and reference images were saved in Standard Tessellation Language (STL) and imported into software (Geomagic Control X 2022, 3D Systems Inc., USA). Discrepancies between the reference image and the samples were recorded as root mean square (RMS) and standard deviation (SD). Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests, and interquartile range (IQR) were used for statistical analysis with THE significance level p

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.1623198
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Accuracy of Intraoral Scanner with Different Inlay Preparation Geometry

Yunus Emre Özden, Zeynep Özkurt‐Kayahan, Bengü Doğu Kaya, Pınar Yılmaz Atalı
Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences
Dental materials and restorations
article

Evaluation of Accuracy of Intraoral Scanner with Different Inlay Preparation Geometry

Yunus Emre Özden, Zeynep Özkurt‐Kayahan, Bengü Doğu Kaya, Pınar Yılmaz Atalı
article en

Abstract

Objective: This in vitro study aimed to assess the accuracy of an intraoral scanner in inlay preparations with different geometry. Methods: The upper second premolar tooth-shaped models were designed and prepared using a 3D printer (Phrozen Mega 8K, Phrozen, Taiwan). Three distinct inlay preparation configurations were utilized, including buccal and palatal wall divergence at 6°, 8°, and 10°. The reference 3D images were acquired through scanning of each model with varying inlay preparation using an extraoral scanner (E1, 3Shape, Denmark). Thirty 3D images (samples) were obtained from each of the three models (n = 10) using an intraoral scanner (Trios 3, 3Shape, Denmark). The samples and reference images were saved in Standard Tessellation Language (STL) and imported into software (Geomagic Control X 2022, 3D Systems Inc., USA). Discrepancies between the reference image and the samples were recorded as root mean square (RMS) and standard deviation (SD). Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests, and interquartile range (IQR) were used for statistical analysis with THE significance level p

Clinical and Experimental Health SciencesVol. 15(2)
Yeditepe University (TR), Lokman Hekim Üniversitesi (TR), Marmara University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of Accuracy of Intraoral Scanner with Different Inlay Preparation Geometry — Yunus Emre Özden, Zeynep Özkurt‐Kayahan, et al. · Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS