Inhibiting Effects of Vegetation Coverage on Runoff, Sediment, and Organic Carbon Loss on Steep Loess Gully‐Slopes

ABSTRACT In the steep gully slopes below the gully shoulder line, the effect of vegetation coverage on the relationship between erosion and soil organic carbon loss has not been completely clarified. Our in situ rainfall experiments were implemented on plots with five grass coverages on the gully‐slopes of the Loess Plateau. Vegetation coverage affected the linear relationship between runoff and sediment. The slope of the fitted line decreased with increasing coverage, meaning that the increase in coverage reduced the sediment transport capacity of flow. High coverage resulted in higher runoff cost for sediment control than medium coverage. The runoff cost for sediment control values at 75% and 90% coverage was 1.69–1.71 times greater than that of 50% coverage. The lower and high thresholds for vegetation cover related to erosion were 35% and 65%, and higher for runoff (lower threshold: 40%; high threshold: 75%). Increasing coverage reduced the total organic carbon loss (TOC) and decreased by 66.9%–99.9%. There was an increasing power function between runoff and organic carbon loss, and between erosion and organic carbon loss with different vegetation coverage ( R 2 > 0.95, p < 0.05). Revegetation reduced organic carbon loss mainly by controlling erosion. The interception effect of vegetation on sediment‐bound organic carbon (SOC) (67.2%–96.2%) was greater than that on dissolved organic carbon (DOC) (1.56%–75.5%). Sediment was the main carrier of TOC, and SOC accounted for 87.5%–99.6% of TOC, but the increase of coverage reduced the proportion of SOC in TOC. This study provides a basis for reducing sediment in the Yellow River and stabilizing the carbon sinks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land Degradation and Development
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.70039
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Soil erosion and sediment transport
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inhibiting Effects of Vegetation Coverage on Runoff, Sediment, and Organic Carbon Loss on Steep Loess Gully‐Slopes

Li‐Shi Luo, Wenzhao Guo, Xuchao Zhu, Jiaxin Li et al.
4 citations
Land Degradation and Development
Soil erosion and sediment transport
4.74
article

Inhibiting Effects of Vegetation Coverage on Runoff, Sediment, and Organic Carbon Loss on Steep Loess Gully‐Slopes

Li‐Shi Luo, Wenzhao Guo, Xuchao Zhu, Jiaxin Li, Yonghong Li, Pei Tian, Haoze Sun, Xingni Hu
article en
4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the steep gully slopes below the gully shoulder line, the effect of vegetation coverage on the relationship between erosion and soil organic carbon loss has not been completely clarified. Our in situ rainfall experiments were implemented on plots with five grass coverages on the gully‐slopes of the Loess Plateau. Vegetation coverage affected the linear relationship between runoff and sediment. The slope of the fitted line decreased with increasing coverage, meaning that the increase in coverage reduced the sediment transport capacity of flow. High coverage resulted in higher runoff cost for sediment control than medium coverage. The runoff cost for sediment control values at 75% and 90% coverage was 1.69–1.71 times greater than that of 50% coverage. The lower and high thresholds for vegetation cover related to erosion were 35% and 65%, and higher for runoff (lower threshold: 40%; high threshold: 75%). Increasing coverage reduced the total organic carbon loss (TOC) and decreased by 66.9%–99.9%. There was an increasing power function between runoff and organic carbon loss, and between erosion and organic carbon loss with different vegetation coverage ( R 2 > 0.95, p < 0.05). Revegetation reduced organic carbon loss mainly by controlling erosion. The interception effect of vegetation on sediment‐bound organic carbon (SOC) (67.2%–96.2%) was greater than that on dissolved organic carbon (DOC) (1.56%–75.5%). Sediment was the main carrier of TOC, and SOC accounted for 87.5%–99.6% of TOC, but the increase of coverage reduced the proportion of SOC in TOC. This study provides a basis for reducing sediment in the Yellow River and stabilizing the carbon sinks.

Land Degradation and DevelopmentVol. 36(16)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Central China Normal University (CN), Institute of Soil and Water Conservation (CN), Institute of Soil Science (CN)
Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, Chinese Universities Scientific Fund, State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Soil erosion and sediment transport
4.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.