A Cost-Based Assignment of Demand-Responsive Transport: A Comparative Study with Public Transportation Alternatives

Demand-responsive transport (DRT), a flexible and dynamic mode, is becoming popular in urban cities but often competes with traditional public transport (PT). This paper explores the integration of DRT and PT, introducing a decision-making strategy that evaluates DRT and PT options based on travel time and fare. By prioritizing routes where DRT offers the most value and relegating less cost-efficient journeys to PT, this strategy aims to optimize the utility of both modes. Implemented and tested using the MATSim simulator in Inner Melbourne, Australia, the findings indicate a significant improvement in system efficiency: 15-18% of requests were economically rejected, reducing overall travel costs by approximately 9-16%, with total fare savings estimated between 14-31%. This study demonstrates the potential trade-offs between system travel time and fare, substantiating the model’s effectiveness in enhancing urban transport systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation research procedia
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2025.06.134
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Cost-Based Assignment of Demand-Responsive Transport: A Comparative Study with Public Transportation Alternatives

Janak Parmar, Sapan Tiwari, Samarth Ghoslya
1 citations
Transportation research procedia
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
0.68
article

A Cost-Based Assignment of Demand-Responsive Transport: A Comparative Study with Public Transportation Alternatives

Janak Parmar, Sapan Tiwari, Samarth Ghoslya
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Demand-responsive transport (DRT), a flexible and dynamic mode, is becoming popular in urban cities but often competes with traditional public transport (PT). This paper explores the integration of DRT and PT, introducing a decision-making strategy that evaluates DRT and PT options based on travel time and fare. By prioritizing routes where DRT offers the most value and relegating less cost-efficient journeys to PT, this strategy aims to optimize the utility of both modes. Implemented and tested using the MATSim simulator in Inner Melbourne, Australia, the findings indicate a significant improvement in system efficiency: 15-18% of requests were economically rejected, reducing overall travel costs by approximately 9-16%, with total fare savings estimated between 14-31%. This study demonstrates the potential trade-offs between system travel time and fare, substantiating the model’s effectiveness in enhancing urban transport systems.

Transportation research procediaVol. 90
The University of Melbourne (AU), MIT University (MK), University Niccolò Cusano (IT), RMIT University (AU), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
0.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Cost-Based Assignment of Demand-Responsive Transport: A Comparative Study with Public Transportation Alternatives — Janak Parmar, Sapan Tiwari, et al. · Transportation research procedia (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS