Who benefits from fleet electrification? quantifying the costs and benefits of transportation electrification strategies from different perspectives

• Fleet-electrification costs and benefits vary substantially by stakeholders. • Irish 2030 fleet electrification: €6.4B net consumer benefit €7.6B net exchequer cost. • Consumer benefit: fuel, EV grants, VRT savings. Exchequer cost: EV supports, tax loss. • Revised EV grants can save up to €2B, new tax systems save up to €550 M (2020–2030). • Social cost-benefit of −€0.6B − Excluding deadweight cost delivers €2.0B by 2030. Many countries have ambitious fleet electrification targets as part of their decarbonisation strategies. The transition will involve government supports, upfront costs to the consumers, and substantial impacts on the existing transportation tax base. This paper analyses the costs and benefits of defined pathways toward the national passenger electric vehicle (EV) target in Ireland from the perspective of the consumer, the exchequer, and society as a whole. This shift from a single-focus cost-benefit analysis enables consideration of differing priorities and issues for each group and offers quantified analysis to support the design and evaluation of policy in terms of rates of fleet change, consumer incentives and grant schemes, rebalancing of exchequer revenue, and the dynamic refinement of EV policy. Results demonstrate that EVs can deliver substantial benefits for car purchasers and costs for the exchequer. A negative net social benefit (NSB) is estimated to 2030, however, this ignores the requirement to meet legally-binding climate and air abatement commitments that would arguably justify the omission of the cost of public funds thereby turning the NSB positive. Notably, the earlier delivery of the fleet electrification strategy assessed delivers three times the consumer benefits of the later EV adoption rate scenario. The analysis also highlights specific adjustments that could be adopted to improve the performance of the overall policy package, including insights for refining the electrification pathway strategy, further evidence for raising public awareness of EV benefits and costs, and recommended reforms for the tax system and EV grant scheme to achieve better revenue balance into the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2025.101492
Primary Topic
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who benefits from fleet electrification? quantifying the costs and benefits of transportation electrification strategies from different perspectives

Yulu Guo, J. Andrew Kelly, J. Peter Clinch
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
article

Who benefits from fleet electrification? quantifying the costs and benefits of transportation electrification strategies from different perspectives

Yulu Guo, J. Andrew Kelly, J. Peter Clinch
article en

Abstract

• Fleet-electrification costs and benefits vary substantially by stakeholders. • Irish 2030 fleet electrification: €6.4B net consumer benefit €7.6B net exchequer cost. • Consumer benefit: fuel, EV grants, VRT savings. Exchequer cost: EV supports, tax loss. • Revised EV grants can save up to €2B, new tax systems save up to €550 M (2020–2030). • Social cost-benefit of −€0.6B − Excluding deadweight cost delivers €2.0B by 2030. Many countries have ambitious fleet electrification targets as part of their decarbonisation strategies. The transition will involve government supports, upfront costs to the consumers, and substantial impacts on the existing transportation tax base. This paper analyses the costs and benefits of defined pathways toward the national passenger electric vehicle (EV) target in Ireland from the perspective of the consumer, the exchequer, and society as a whole. This shift from a single-focus cost-benefit analysis enables consideration of differing priorities and issues for each group and offers quantified analysis to support the design and evaluation of policy in terms of rates of fleet change, consumer incentives and grant schemes, rebalancing of exchequer revenue, and the dynamic refinement of EV policy. Results demonstrate that EVs can deliver substantial benefits for car purchasers and costs for the exchequer. A negative net social benefit (NSB) is estimated to 2030, however, this ignores the requirement to meet legally-binding climate and air abatement commitments that would arguably justify the omission of the cost of public funds thereby turning the NSB positive. Notably, the earlier delivery of the fleet electrification strategy assessed delivers three times the consumer benefits of the later EV adoption rate scenario. The analysis also highlights specific adjustments that could be adopted to improve the performance of the overall policy package, including insights for refining the electrification pathway strategy, further evidence for raising public awareness of EV benefits and costs, and recommended reforms for the tax system and EV grant scheme to achieve better revenue balance into the future.

Transportation Research Interdisciplinary PerspectivesVol. 32
University College Dublin (IE), Data Fusion International (Ireland) (IE)
Department of the Environment, Climate and Communications
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.