Redefining Defence Expenditures in B9 Countries:A Risk-Based Model for Rational Allocation under Foreign Threat Scenarios

The article proposes a risk-based model for rational defence expenditure in NATO’s Bucharest Nine (B9) countries that integrates socioeconomic variables and challenges the 2 %-of-GDP benchmark. It contends that optimal funding should reflect both national wealth and the probability and expected consequences of a foreign attack. Applying a quantitative model spanning 2001–2024, with emphasis on the post-2014 environment after Russia’s seizure of Crimea, the authors correlate actual spending with perceived risk and analyse shifts in budgets, threat perceptions, and prosperity, revealing major gaps between observed and rationalised outlays. The results underscore the value of context-sensitive, evidence-grounded budgeting for strategic foresight, credible deterrence, and prudent resource allocation under uncertainty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obrana a strategie (Defence & Strategy)
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3849/1802-7199.25.2025.01.71-112
Primary Topic
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Redefining Defence Expenditures in B9 Countries:A Risk-Based Model for Rational Allocation under Foreign Threat Scenarios

Vlastimil Šlouf, Vojtěch Müllner, Ondřej Pekař, Lenka Brizgalová et al.
Obrana a strategie (Defence & Strategy)
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
article

Redefining Defence Expenditures in B9 Countries:A Risk-Based Model for Rational Allocation under Foreign Threat Scenarios

Vlastimil Šlouf, Vojtěch Müllner, Ondřej Pekař, Lenka Brizgalová, Martin Bláha
article en

Abstract

The article proposes a risk-based model for rational defence expenditure in NATO’s Bucharest Nine (B9) countries that integrates socioeconomic variables and challenges the 2 %-of-GDP benchmark. It contends that optimal funding should reflect both national wealth and the probability and expected consequences of a foreign attack. Applying a quantitative model spanning 2001–2024, with emphasis on the post-2014 environment after Russia’s seizure of Crimea, the authors correlate actual spending with perceived risk and analyse shifts in budgets, threat perceptions, and prosperity, revealing major gaps between observed and rationalised outlays. The results underscore the value of context-sensitive, evidence-grounded budgeting for strategic foresight, credible deterrence, and prudent resource allocation under uncertainty.

Obrana a strategie (Defence & Strategy)Vol. 25(1)
University of Defence (CZ)
Ministerstvo Obrany České Republiky
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.