Structural Origins of Intersectional Stereotype Content

People are stereotyped according to multiple identities—or social categories—at once, giving rise to “intersectional stereotypes” about warmth and competence. Most work on the structural roots of stereotype content—especially intergroup inequalities and divisions of labor—focuses on whole social categories rather than intersectional identities, so it is an open question whether these theories account for intersectional stereotype content as well. I define 96 intersectional “strata” based on gender, sexuality, age, and race/ethnicity and examine the relationships between socioeconomic status (SES) and occupations of people with those identities in census data and survey experiment participants’ perceptions and stereotypes of those identities. Results support a model in which SES, roles, and perceived competitiveness of people with varying intersectional identities lead to intersectional stereotypes that rationalize existing intersectional inequalities and divisions of labor. Findings suggest that intersectional methods and theorizing can improve understanding of stereotypes without sacrificing parsimony.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Psychology Quarterly
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01902725251339477
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structural Origins of Intersectional Stereotype Content

Nicholas Heiserman
Social Psychology Quarterly
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Structural Origins of Intersectional Stereotype Content

Nicholas Heiserman
article en

Abstract

People are stereotyped according to multiple identities—or social categories—at once, giving rise to “intersectional stereotypes” about warmth and competence. Most work on the structural roots of stereotype content—especially intergroup inequalities and divisions of labor—focuses on whole social categories rather than intersectional identities, so it is an open question whether these theories account for intersectional stereotype content as well. I define 96 intersectional “strata” based on gender, sexuality, age, and race/ethnicity and examine the relationships between socioeconomic status (SES) and occupations of people with those identities in census data and survey experiment participants’ perceptions and stereotypes of those identities. Results support a model in which SES, roles, and perceived competitiveness of people with varying intersectional identities lead to intersectional stereotypes that rationalize existing intersectional inequalities and divisions of labor. Findings suggest that intersectional methods and theorizing can improve understanding of stereotypes without sacrificing parsimony.

Social Psychology QuarterlyVol. 88(3)
Oklahoma State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Structural Origins of Intersectional Stereotype Content — Nicholas Heiserman · Social Psychology Quarterly (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS