Cognitive Load and Challenges in Self-regulation: An Introduction and Reflection on the Topical Collection

The effort monitoring and regulation (EMR) model integrates self-regulated learning and cognitive load theory to examine how students monitor, regulate, and optimize effort during learning. Since its introduction in 2020, it has inspired research that explores how to correct learners' misinterpretations of effort and metacognitive biases and how instructional interventions can improve learning strategies. The current topical collection titled <i>Cognitive Load: Challenges in Self-regulation</i> includes seven empirical papers, two review papers, one meta-analysis, and a discussion paper. These contributions build on the EMR model by testing its assumptions, linking it to motivation, and refining our understanding of the basis of effort ratings in learning. Among other findings, the findings in the topical collection (1) show that feedback valence can affect participants' perceived task effort and their willingness to invest effort via feelings of challenge and threat, (2) provide the first evidence of far metacognitive transfer, and (3) propose a novel categorization of effort based on the underlying psychological sources when experiencing and allocating mental effort. In this editorial introduction, we summarize the topical collection papers, connect their findings to the EMR model, and finally reflect on how these novel insights can further develop the model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Psychology Review
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10042-2
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.47

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cognitive Load and Challenges in Self-regulation: An Introduction and Reflection on the Topical Collection

Ferdinand Stebner, Eva M. Janssen, Anique B. H. de Bruin, Julia Waldeyer
4 citations
Educational Psychology Review
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
8.47
article

Cognitive Load and Challenges in Self-regulation: An Introduction and Reflection on the Topical Collection

Ferdinand Stebner, Eva M. Janssen, Anique B. H. de Bruin, Julia Waldeyer
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The effort monitoring and regulation (EMR) model integrates self-regulated learning and cognitive load theory to examine how students monitor, regulate, and optimize effort during learning. Since its introduction in 2020, it has inspired research that explores how to correct learners' misinterpretations of effort and metacognitive biases and how instructional interventions can improve learning strategies. The current topical collection titled <i>Cognitive Load: Challenges in Self-regulation</i> includes seven empirical papers, two review papers, one meta-analysis, and a discussion paper. These contributions build on the EMR model by testing its assumptions, linking it to motivation, and refining our understanding of the basis of effort ratings in learning. Among other findings, the findings in the topical collection (1) show that feedback valence can affect participants' perceived task effort and their willingness to invest effort via feelings of challenge and threat, (2) provide the first evidence of far metacognitive transfer, and (3) propose a novel categorization of effort based on the underlying psychological sources when experiencing and allocating mental effort. In this editorial introduction, we summarize the topical collection papers, connect their findings to the EMR model, and finally reflect on how these novel insights can further develop the model.

Educational Psychology ReviewVol. 37(3)
Osnabrück University (DE), Utrecht University (NL), Department of Education (ES), Ruhr University Bochum (DE), Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Jacobs Foundation
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
8.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.