Educational development in secure juvenile justice settings: The benefits, the challenges and power dynamics in international research collaborations

International research collaborations (IRCs) can play a significant role in shaping educational development, particularly in youth justice settings. This study explores the benefits, challenges, and structural inequalities within IRCs focused on education for justice-involved children and young people. Drawing on qualitative data from participants from three Erasmus+ -funded projects across multiple European countries, the findings highlight how IRCs enable the exchange of knowledge, the adaptation of educational practices, and the development of more inclusive policies. However, persistent structural inequalities shape the dynamics of these collaborations. Participants from lower-income countries were more aware of hierarchical power relations, reinforcing existing critiques of global North-South imbalances where similar patterns were observed within European partnerships. Leadership roles, funding, and research methodologies were influenced by perceived credibility of established institutions and economic disparities, impacting on equitable participation. Methodological challenges, including language barriers, ethical considerations, and variations in data collection processes, also shaped the consistency and effectiveness of these collaborations. Despite these challenges, the study demonstrates that IRCs have the potential to foster meaningful learning and innovation when equity is embedded in collaborative frameworks. The research highlights the need for more equitable funding mechanisms, leadership development initiatives, and methodological strategies that prioritise inclusion. By critically examining the complexities of international research in youth justice education, this paper contributes to broader discussions on how IRCs can be more effective, even in the most constrained of research contexts. The findings have direct implications for policymakers, funding bodies, and practitioners seeking to strengthen the role of international collaboration in educational research. • International research collaborations (IRCs) play a key role in advancing educational development in youth justice settings by fostering knowledge exchange and policy adaptation. • Power imbalances persist in IRCs, with lower-income country participants more aware of hierarchical structures in leadership, funding, and decision-making. • Successful collaborations rely on equitable funding, strong leadership, and reciprocal learning rather than one-sided policy borrowing. • The study advocates for reforms in funding distribution, leadership development, and methodological approaches to minimise the negative impacts of power imbalances.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Educational Development
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103346
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Educational development in secure juvenile justice settings: The benefits, the challenges and power dynamics in international research collaborations

Adeela ahmed Shafi, Tristan Middleton
International Journal of Educational Development
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

Educational development in secure juvenile justice settings: The benefits, the challenges and power dynamics in international research collaborations

Adeela ahmed Shafi, Tristan Middleton
article en

Abstract

International research collaborations (IRCs) can play a significant role in shaping educational development, particularly in youth justice settings. This study explores the benefits, challenges, and structural inequalities within IRCs focused on education for justice-involved children and young people. Drawing on qualitative data from participants from three Erasmus+ -funded projects across multiple European countries, the findings highlight how IRCs enable the exchange of knowledge, the adaptation of educational practices, and the development of more inclusive policies. However, persistent structural inequalities shape the dynamics of these collaborations. Participants from lower-income countries were more aware of hierarchical power relations, reinforcing existing critiques of global North-South imbalances where similar patterns were observed within European partnerships. Leadership roles, funding, and research methodologies were influenced by perceived credibility of established institutions and economic disparities, impacting on equitable participation. Methodological challenges, including language barriers, ethical considerations, and variations in data collection processes, also shaped the consistency and effectiveness of these collaborations. Despite these challenges, the study demonstrates that IRCs have the potential to foster meaningful learning and innovation when equity is embedded in collaborative frameworks. The research highlights the need for more equitable funding mechanisms, leadership development initiatives, and methodological strategies that prioritise inclusion. By critically examining the complexities of international research in youth justice education, this paper contributes to broader discussions on how IRCs can be more effective, even in the most constrained of research contexts. The findings have direct implications for policymakers, funding bodies, and practitioners seeking to strengthen the role of international collaboration in educational research. • International research collaborations (IRCs) play a key role in advancing educational development in youth justice settings by fostering knowledge exchange and policy adaptation. • Power imbalances persist in IRCs, with lower-income country participants more aware of hierarchical structures in leadership, funding, and decision-making. • Successful collaborations rely on equitable funding, strong leadership, and reciprocal learning rather than one-sided policy borrowing. • The study advocates for reforms in funding distribution, leadership development, and methodological approaches to minimise the negative impacts of power imbalances.

International Journal of Educational DevelopmentVol. 117
University of Gloucestershire (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.