Multistage Dynamic Online Codiagnosis Three-Sided Matching Decision-Making Approach Based on Regret Theory and Evidential Reasoning

To meet the service requirements of online codiagnosis matching in a hierarchical diagnosis and treatment environment, this paper proposes a multistage dynamic three-sided matching decision-making (TSMDM) method based on regret theory and evidential reasoning, which can consider hybrid preference information and the psychological behavior characteristics of regret avoidance among matching parties. First, on the basis of reviews on the online medical platform Dingxiang Doctor in China, the objective matching attributes of patients toward grassroots doctors are obtained via Word2Vec and SnowNLP technology. Then, a corresponding weight determination model is constructed that combines these attributes and preference information for each attribute provided by decision-makers (DMs). Second, considering the fuzziness and diversity of the preference information of the matching parties, a hybrid preference information fusion model is constructed. Furthermore, the dynamics of the matching decision-making process are considered by integrating the learning mechanism into the calculation of dynamic reference points for dynamic matching problems. Third, from the perspective of the bounded rationality of matching parties, regret theory and evidential reasoning are used to obtain the degree of satisfaction of three-sided matching parties. Then, a multistage dynamic three-sided stable matching optimization model is established to maximize the corresponding degree of satisfaction of the three sides, which can obtain the final matching pairs. Finally, an example of online codiagnosis of chronic diseases under a medical hierarchical diagnosis and treatment environment is explored, and sensitivity analysis is also performed to verify the feasibility and stability of the proposed method. The results show that the proposed method can better express the preference information of three sides and improve their satisfaction with the treatment process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219622025500762
Primary Topic
Advanced Decision-Making Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multistage Dynamic Online Codiagnosis Three-Sided Matching Decision-Making Approach Based on Regret Theory and Evidential Reasoning

Charles X. Ling, Qingqi Long, Juanjuan Peng
International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making
Advanced Decision-Making Techniques
article

Multistage Dynamic Online Codiagnosis Three-Sided Matching Decision-Making Approach Based on Regret Theory and Evidential Reasoning

Charles X. Ling, Qingqi Long, Juanjuan Peng
article en

Abstract

To meet the service requirements of online codiagnosis matching in a hierarchical diagnosis and treatment environment, this paper proposes a multistage dynamic three-sided matching decision-making (TSMDM) method based on regret theory and evidential reasoning, which can consider hybrid preference information and the psychological behavior characteristics of regret avoidance among matching parties. First, on the basis of reviews on the online medical platform Dingxiang Doctor in China, the objective matching attributes of patients toward grassroots doctors are obtained via Word2Vec and SnowNLP technology. Then, a corresponding weight determination model is constructed that combines these attributes and preference information for each attribute provided by decision-makers (DMs). Second, considering the fuzziness and diversity of the preference information of the matching parties, a hybrid preference information fusion model is constructed. Furthermore, the dynamics of the matching decision-making process are considered by integrating the learning mechanism into the calculation of dynamic reference points for dynamic matching problems. Third, from the perspective of the bounded rationality of matching parties, regret theory and evidential reasoning are used to obtain the degree of satisfaction of three-sided matching parties. Then, a multistage dynamic three-sided stable matching optimization model is established to maximize the corresponding degree of satisfaction of the three sides, which can obtain the final matching pairs. Finally, an example of online codiagnosis of chronic diseases under a medical hierarchical diagnosis and treatment environment is explored, and sensitivity analysis is also performed to verify the feasibility and stability of the proposed method. The results show that the proposed method can better express the preference information of three sides and improve their satisfaction with the treatment process.

International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making
Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics (CN)
National Social Science Fund of China
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Advanced Decision-Making Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.