Cash for conservation? Integrating basic income support into biodiversity and climate finance

This article outlines the idea of a Basic Income for Nature and Climate (BINC) as a novel mechanism for funding biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation activities. This proposal responds to two important empirical developments. The first concerns growing discussions around cash transfer programs and universal basic income within international development discussions. While these are increasingly implemented or piloted, they do not usually take into account environmental issues including biodiversity conservation. The second relates to market-based instruments like payments for ecosystem services and REDD+ (reduced emissions through avoided deforestation and forest degradation). In practice, these programs have commonly failed to halt biodiversity loss and alleviate poverty. The BINC proposal aims to integrate and transcend these existing mechanisms as part of a broader program of transformative change in conservation policy and practice that foregrounds concerns for social justice and equity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2025.101554
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cash for conservation? Integrating basic income support into biodiversity and climate finance

Emiel de Lange, Omar Saif, Munib Khanyari, Jocelyne Sze et al.
3 citations
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
3.32
article

Cash for conservation? Integrating basic income support into biodiversity and climate finance

Emiel de Lange, Omar Saif, Munib Khanyari, Jocelyne Sze, Robert H. Fletcher, Ben C. West, Isabel Felandro
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This article outlines the idea of a Basic Income for Nature and Climate (BINC) as a novel mechanism for funding biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation activities. This proposal responds to two important empirical developments. The first concerns growing discussions around cash transfer programs and universal basic income within international development discussions. While these are increasingly implemented or piloted, they do not usually take into account environmental issues including biodiversity conservation. The second relates to market-based instruments like payments for ecosystem services and REDD+ (reduced emissions through avoided deforestation and forest degradation). In practice, these programs have commonly failed to halt biodiversity loss and alleviate poverty. The BINC proposal aims to integrate and transcend these existing mechanisms as part of a broader program of transformative change in conservation policy and practice that foregrounds concerns for social justice and equity.

Current Opinion in Environmental SustainabilityVol. 75
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Medical Protective (US), University of Cambodia (KH), Earth Science Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen University and Research
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
3.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cash for conservation? Integrating basic income support into biodiversity and climate finance — Emiel de Lange, Omar Saif, et al. · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS