Learning disability as a determinant of digital behavior in adolescents with ADHD: a cross-sectional study

Problematic technology use (PTU) has become an increasingly relevant concern among children and adolescents, warranting examination of risk factors that might influence usage patterns. Although Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is frequently studied in relation to technology use, little is known about the additional impact of comorbid Learning disorders (LD) within this population. This study examines the impact of LD on PTU among children and adolescents with ADHD. A total of 172 participants aged 8–17 and their parents were interviewed regarding screen time, types of devices used, and digital activity patterns. Half (n = 86) were diagnosed with ADHD + LD, and the other half (n = 86) with only ADHD. Youth completed the Young Internet Addiction Scale, Internet Gaming Disorder Scale, Social Media Addiction Scale and Smartphone Addiction Scale. Parents of the ADHD + LD group completed the Mathematics and Literacy Assessment Scale to evaluate LD symptom severity. No significant difference in screen time per day was found between groups (p > 0.05). The ADHD + LD group used fewer device types (t(170) = 3.30, p = 0.004), showing lower preference for mobile phones (X2(1) = 4.79, p = 0.038) and personal computers (X2(1) = 7.07, p = 0.016). They spent less time texting (p = 0.026), watching movies (p = 0.026) and videos (p = 0.041), listening to music (p = 0.004) and educational activities (p < 0.001). Gaming participation rates were similar, but Real-Time Strategy (p = 0.004), Multiplayer Online Battle Arena (p = 0.002), and Puzzle & Platform (p = 0.004) games were less preferred by the ADHD + LD group. Weak positive correlations were found between the number of screen-based devices owned and screen time per day (r = 0.204, p = 0.007), and device ownership duration and screen time per day (r = 0.282, p < 0.001). Scale scores did not differ significantly between groups, and Mathematics and Literacy Assessment Scale scores showed no correlation with other scale scores or screen time per day (p > 0.05). Although overall screen time and PTU severity were similar between groups, youth with ADHD and comorbid LD engaged in a narrower range of screen-based activities. These findings suggest that LD may shape digital behavior not in terms of quantity, but through differences in how technology is used.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-025-02802-w
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Child Development and Digital Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning disability as a determinant of digital behavior in adolescents with ADHD: a cross-sectional study

İbrahim Adak, Oğuz Bilal Karakuş, Şükrücan Kocabaş, Zeynep Ece Toksoy
1 citations
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Child Development and Digital Technology
8.93
article

Learning disability as a determinant of digital behavior in adolescents with ADHD: a cross-sectional study

İbrahim Adak, Oğuz Bilal Karakuş, Şükrücan Kocabaş, Zeynep Ece Toksoy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Problematic technology use (PTU) has become an increasingly relevant concern among children and adolescents, warranting examination of risk factors that might influence usage patterns. Although Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is frequently studied in relation to technology use, little is known about the additional impact of comorbid Learning disorders (LD) within this population. This study examines the impact of LD on PTU among children and adolescents with ADHD. A total of 172 participants aged 8–17 and their parents were interviewed regarding screen time, types of devices used, and digital activity patterns. Half (n = 86) were diagnosed with ADHD + LD, and the other half (n = 86) with only ADHD. Youth completed the Young Internet Addiction Scale, Internet Gaming Disorder Scale, Social Media Addiction Scale and Smartphone Addiction Scale. Parents of the ADHD + LD group completed the Mathematics and Literacy Assessment Scale to evaluate LD symptom severity. No significant difference in screen time per day was found between groups (p > 0.05). The ADHD + LD group used fewer device types (t(170) = 3.30, p = 0.004), showing lower preference for mobile phones (X2(1) = 4.79, p = 0.038) and personal computers (X2(1) = 7.07, p = 0.016). They spent less time texting (p = 0.026), watching movies (p = 0.026) and videos (p = 0.041), listening to music (p = 0.004) and educational activities (p < 0.001). Gaming participation rates were similar, but Real-Time Strategy (p = 0.004), Multiplayer Online Battle Arena (p = 0.002), and Puzzle & Platform (p = 0.004) games were less preferred by the ADHD + LD group. Weak positive correlations were found between the number of screen-based devices owned and screen time per day (r = 0.204, p = 0.007), and device ownership duration and screen time per day (r = 0.282, p < 0.001). Scale scores did not differ significantly between groups, and Mathematics and Literacy Assessment Scale scores showed no correlation with other scale scores or screen time per day (p > 0.05). Although overall screen time and PTU severity were similar between groups, youth with ADHD and comorbid LD engaged in a narrower range of screen-based activities. These findings suggest that LD may shape digital behavior not in terms of quantity, but through differences in how technology is used.

European Child & Adolescent PsychiatryVol. 34(12)
Bakırköy Psychiatric Hospital (TR), Uni Research (Norway) (NO), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), AVL (Turkey) (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Child Development and Digital Technology
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.