Analysis of Different Perspectives of Community-Based Long-Term Day-Care Centers

This study involved the secondary data analysis of empirical results obtained from the 2023-2024 on-site evaluation of 26 community-based long-term day-care centers (referred to as day-care centers) in Taiwan to determine the status of performance. Although the on-site evaluation results used in this study were all qualified (an evaluation score ≥70 points), a score range of 73.625-96.625 points were widely observed. The evaluation was carried out from the following perspectives: management effectiveness, professional care quality, safe environment, and the protection of individual rights. The results showed that management effectiveness was positively correlated with professional care quality, safe environment, and the protection of individual rights (<i>r</i> = 0.498~0.596); professional care quality was moderately correlated with safe environment and the protection of individual rights (<i>r</i> = 0.482~0.495); and safe environment and the protection of individual rights had the lowest correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.296). A paired-samples t-test showed that the average difference between each pair (institutional self-evaluation and evaluation committee score) in the consensus benchmark was significant. These findings suggest that the overall service quality and management efficiency of day-care centers can be improved by strengthening internal self-assessment training, improving consensus benchmark definitions, and upgrading management processes so that the evaluation results reflect the actual implementation status.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22071017
Primary Topic
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Different Perspectives of Community-Based Long-Term Day-Care Centers

Pin-Hsuan Chiang, Jui-Ying Hung, Kejun Li
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
article

Analysis of Different Perspectives of Community-Based Long-Term Day-Care Centers

Pin-Hsuan Chiang, Jui-Ying Hung, Kejun Li
article en

Abstract

This study involved the secondary data analysis of empirical results obtained from the 2023-2024 on-site evaluation of 26 community-based long-term day-care centers (referred to as day-care centers) in Taiwan to determine the status of performance. Although the on-site evaluation results used in this study were all qualified (an evaluation score ≥70 points), a score range of 73.625-96.625 points were widely observed. The evaluation was carried out from the following perspectives: management effectiveness, professional care quality, safe environment, and the protection of individual rights. The results showed that management effectiveness was positively correlated with professional care quality, safe environment, and the protection of individual rights (<i>r</i> = 0.498~0.596); professional care quality was moderately correlated with safe environment and the protection of individual rights (<i>r</i> = 0.482~0.495); and safe environment and the protection of individual rights had the lowest correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.296). A paired-samples t-test showed that the average difference between each pair (institutional self-evaluation and evaluation committee score) in the consensus benchmark was significant. These findings suggest that the overall service quality and management efficiency of day-care centers can be improved by strengthening internal self-assessment training, improving consensus benchmark definitions, and upgrading management processes so that the evaluation results reflect the actual implementation status.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthVol. 22(7)
Chaoyang University of Technology (TW)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.