Tarsal thickness comparison between upper and lower eyelids

Background: The difference between the upper and the lower eyelids are still unknown. Objective: To compare the thickness of upper and lower tarsal plates in microscopic specimens. Methods: Central sagittal sections of 22 upper and lower eyelids on the same hemi-faces (12 right and 10 left) from 15 Japanese cadavers (8 males and 7 females), aged 38-88 years (average age: 70.5 years) were histologically examined. The specimens were fixed in 10% formalin and stained with the Masson’s trichrome. The thickest part of each specimen was measured on inspection. The statistical analyses were performed using the Student t-test to compare the thickness of the upper and lower tarsal plates. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to examine the age differences: younger group (38-61-year-old) and elder group (73-88-year-old), sex, and laterality in each upper or lower eyelid. The significance level was set at 0.05. Results: The total upper and lower tarsal plate thickness showed a statistically significant difference, in which the lower tarsal plate was thicker than the upper (p=0.001). The differences in tarsal plate thickness by age (p=0.632 in upper, p=0.585 in lower), sex (p=0.844 in upper, p=0.375 in lower), and laterality (p=0.921 in upper, p=0.307 in lower) did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: The lower tarsal plate thickness was thicker than the upper one, but no difference was shown in age, sex, and laterality between the upper and lower tarsal plates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Cosmetic Medicine
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25056/jcm.2025.9.1.7
Primary Topic
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tarsal thickness comparison between upper and lower eyelids

Hirohiko Kakizaki, Naoyuki Morishige, Osama Al-Sheikh, Yasuhiro Takahashi et al.
The Journal of Cosmetic Medicine
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
article

Tarsal thickness comparison between upper and lower eyelids

Hirohiko Kakizaki, Naoyuki Morishige, Osama Al-Sheikh, Yasuhiro Takahashi, Deepak P. Edward
article en

Abstract

Background: The difference between the upper and the lower eyelids are still unknown. Objective: To compare the thickness of upper and lower tarsal plates in microscopic specimens. Methods: Central sagittal sections of 22 upper and lower eyelids on the same hemi-faces (12 right and 10 left) from 15 Japanese cadavers (8 males and 7 females), aged 38-88 years (average age: 70.5 years) were histologically examined. The specimens were fixed in 10% formalin and stained with the Masson’s trichrome. The thickest part of each specimen was measured on inspection. The statistical analyses were performed using the Student t-test to compare the thickness of the upper and lower tarsal plates. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to examine the age differences: younger group (38-61-year-old) and elder group (73-88-year-old), sex, and laterality in each upper or lower eyelid. The significance level was set at 0.05. Results: The total upper and lower tarsal plate thickness showed a statistically significant difference, in which the lower tarsal plate was thicker than the upper (p=0.001). The differences in tarsal plate thickness by age (p=0.632 in upper, p=0.585 in lower), sex (p=0.844 in upper, p=0.375 in lower), and laterality (p=0.921 in upper, p=0.307 in lower) did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: The lower tarsal plate thickness was thicker than the upper one, but no difference was shown in age, sex, and laterality between the upper and lower tarsal plates.

The Journal of Cosmetic MedicineVol. 9(1)
King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital (SA), Aichi Medical University Hospital (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.