Comparison Of The Efficacy Of Dexmedetomidine And Dexmedetomidine-Magnesium Combination In Sedation Management In Intensive Care

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation of sedation with subjective clinical sedation scores and compare plasma cortisol levels as an objective marker between two groups: patients sedated with dexmedetomidine alone and patients sedated with a combination of dexmedetomidine and magnesium, in mechanically ventilated patients. Materials and Methods A total of 50 patients were enrolled and divided into two groups. Group 1(dexmedetomidine group) received a loading dose of 1μg/kg, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.2-1.4 μg/kg/hour for 24 hours. Group 2(dexmedetomidine+magnesium group) received a loading dose of 1 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.2-1.4 μg/kg/hour for 24 hours, along with two bolus doses of 2 grams of magnesium and a continuous infusion of 16mg/24 hours. Sedation scale scores, Glasgow coma scores, heart rate, and plasma cortisol levels at baseline and at 24 hours were recorded throughout the 24-hour study period. Results At 24 hours, cortisol levels were significantly lower in Group 2(p < 0.05). Heart rate was significantly lower in Group 2, except at baseline(p < 0.05). No significant differences between the groups regarding sedation scale scores or Glasgow coma scores(p > 0.05) were found. Conclusion Although adding magnesium to dexmedetomidine provided sufficient sedation and may have enhanced compliance with mechanical ventilation, no statistically significant difference was observed in achieving the target sedation levels in a clinical setting.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Medical Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2025.01.013
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison Of The Efficacy Of Dexmedetomidine And Dexmedetomidine-Magnesium Combination In Sedation Management In Intensive Care

Hutton Ad, Ning An, Fatih Karaka, zg zmen
Annals of Medical Research
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

Comparison Of The Efficacy Of Dexmedetomidine And Dexmedetomidine-Magnesium Combination In Sedation Management In Intensive Care

Hutton Ad, Ning An, Fatih Karaka, zg zmen
article en

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation of sedation with subjective clinical sedation scores and compare plasma cortisol levels as an objective marker between two groups: patients sedated with dexmedetomidine alone and patients sedated with a combination of dexmedetomidine and magnesium, in mechanically ventilated patients. Materials and Methods A total of 50 patients were enrolled and divided into two groups. Group 1(dexmedetomidine group) received a loading dose of 1μg/kg, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.2-1.4 μg/kg/hour for 24 hours. Group 2(dexmedetomidine+magnesium group) received a loading dose of 1 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.2-1.4 μg/kg/hour for 24 hours, along with two bolus doses of 2 grams of magnesium and a continuous infusion of 16mg/24 hours. Sedation scale scores, Glasgow coma scores, heart rate, and plasma cortisol levels at baseline and at 24 hours were recorded throughout the 24-hour study period. Results At 24 hours, cortisol levels were significantly lower in Group 2(p < 0.05). Heart rate was significantly lower in Group 2, except at baseline(p < 0.05). No significant differences between the groups regarding sedation scale scores or Glasgow coma scores(p > 0.05) were found. Conclusion Although adding magnesium to dexmedetomidine provided sufficient sedation and may have enhanced compliance with mechanical ventilation, no statistically significant difference was observed in achieving the target sedation levels in a clinical setting.

Annals of Medical ResearchVol. 32(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.