Minimally Invasive Lateral Thoracic and Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Expandable Interbody Spacers for Spine Trauma—Indications, Complications and Outcomes

<b>Background</b>: Lateral lumbar or thoracic interbody fusion (LLIF) is increasingly considered for anterior column reconstruction and restoring segmental lordosis in degenerative, infectious, or deformity conditions. Reports about using LLIF with expandable interbody spacers for spine trauma are scarce. <b>Methods</b>: In this retrospective, single-center observational cohort study, we reviewed all patients treated by an expandable LLIF interbody spacer (ELSA<sup>®</sup> Expandable Integrated LLIF Spacer, Globus Medical Inc) for trauma indication at our spine center between September 2018 and January 2024. The primary outcome measures were fusion rate at 12 months, change in segmental sagittal Cobb angle, and clinical outcome according to the MacNab criteria. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and complications. <b>Results</b>: We identified <i>n</i> = 21 patients with a mean age of 48.3 (standard deviation (SD) 15.7), 47.6% were female. LLIF was mostly performed at T11/12 (<i>n</i> = 4; 19.1%) and T12/L1 (<i>n</i> = 10; 47.5%). Indications were AO Spine type A2 (<i>n</i> = 4, 19.1%), A3 (<i>n</i> = 14; 66.7%) or A4 fractures (<i>n</i> = 3; 14.3%) with ligamentous (B2-type) in eight (38.1%) and hyperextension (B3-type) injury in one patient (4.8%). Surgery included the release of the anterior longitudinal ligament in four cases (19.1%). Intraoperative AEs were noted in <i>n</i> = 1 (4.8%), postoperative AEs in <i>n</i> = 3 (14.3%) at discharge, <i>n</i> = 4 (19.1%) at three, and <i>n</i> = 2 (9.5%) at twelve months. Segmental sagittal Cobb angle changed from 1.3° (preoperative) to 13.3° at twelve months (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Functional outcome was excellent/good in <i>n</i> = 15 (71.4%; four missing) at 12 months. The fusion rate at the LLIF level was 100% at the 12-month follow-up. <b>Conclusions</b>: LLIF with expandable interbody spacers for spine trauma (off-label use) is safe, promotes solid fusion (100% fusion rate at 12 months), and enables correction of sagittal segmental Cobb angle (mean improvement of 12°), with good or excellent clinical outcomes in most patients (71.4%).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134557
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Minimally Invasive Lateral Thoracic and Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Expandable Interbody Spacers for Spine Trauma—Indications, Complications and Outcomes

Anand Veeravagu, Benjamin Martens, Gregor Fischer, Linda Bättig et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
article

Minimally Invasive Lateral Thoracic and Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Expandable Interbody Spacers for Spine Trauma—Indications, Complications and Outcomes

Anand Veeravagu, Benjamin Martens, Gregor Fischer, Linda Bättig, Lorenzo Bertulli, Martin N. Stienen
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Lateral lumbar or thoracic interbody fusion (LLIF) is increasingly considered for anterior column reconstruction and restoring segmental lordosis in degenerative, infectious, or deformity conditions. Reports about using LLIF with expandable interbody spacers for spine trauma are scarce. <b>Methods</b>: In this retrospective, single-center observational cohort study, we reviewed all patients treated by an expandable LLIF interbody spacer (ELSA<sup>®</sup> Expandable Integrated LLIF Spacer, Globus Medical Inc) for trauma indication at our spine center between September 2018 and January 2024. The primary outcome measures were fusion rate at 12 months, change in segmental sagittal Cobb angle, and clinical outcome according to the MacNab criteria. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and complications. <b>Results</b>: We identified <i>n</i> = 21 patients with a mean age of 48.3 (standard deviation (SD) 15.7), 47.6% were female. LLIF was mostly performed at T11/12 (<i>n</i> = 4; 19.1%) and T12/L1 (<i>n</i> = 10; 47.5%). Indications were AO Spine type A2 (<i>n</i> = 4, 19.1%), A3 (<i>n</i> = 14; 66.7%) or A4 fractures (<i>n</i> = 3; 14.3%) with ligamentous (B2-type) in eight (38.1%) and hyperextension (B3-type) injury in one patient (4.8%). Surgery included the release of the anterior longitudinal ligament in four cases (19.1%). Intraoperative AEs were noted in <i>n</i> = 1 (4.8%), postoperative AEs in <i>n</i> = 3 (14.3%) at discharge, <i>n</i> = 4 (19.1%) at three, and <i>n</i> = 2 (9.5%) at twelve months. Segmental sagittal Cobb angle changed from 1.3° (preoperative) to 13.3° at twelve months (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Functional outcome was excellent/good in <i>n</i> = 15 (71.4%; four missing) at 12 months. The fusion rate at the LLIF level was 100% at the 12-month follow-up. <b>Conclusions</b>: LLIF with expandable interbody spacers for spine trauma (off-label use) is safe, promotes solid fusion (100% fusion rate at 12 months), and enables correction of sagittal segmental Cobb angle (mean improvement of 12°), with good or excellent clinical outcomes in most patients (71.4%).

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(13)
University of St.Gallen (CH), Stanford University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.