Evaluation of pH Adjustment Chemical for Arsenic-Fluoride Removal Using Activated Alumina

Arsenic and fluoride are co-existing contaminants commonly found in groundwater used for drinking water supply and often exceeding drinking water maximum contaminant levels of 10 µg/L and 4 mg/L, respectively. Adsorption and coagulation followed by filtration are technologies used for treatment. The USA-EPA has identified alumina adsorption as the best available technology. While arsenic removal with activated alumina was not pH-dependent in this study, fluoride removal was pH dependent, with an optimal range between 5.0 - 6.0. A bench study was conducted comparing sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid, and carbon dioxide as alternatives for pH adjustment. While arsenic and fluoride removal were independent of chemicals used for pH adjustment, the costs of pH adjustment with carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid were similar for the site considered, indicating that carbon dioxide can be a safer and better alternative for pH adjustment if a carbon dioxide generating facility is closer to treatment site.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Protection
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2025.166030
Primary Topic
Fluoride Effects and Removal
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of pH Adjustment Chemical for Arsenic-Fluoride Removal Using Activated Alumina

Samantha J. Smith, Katherine Y. Bell, Shubhashini Oza, Giridhar Upadhyaya et al.
Journal of Environmental Protection
Fluoride Effects and Removal
article

Evaluation of pH Adjustment Chemical for Arsenic-Fluoride Removal Using Activated Alumina

Samantha J. Smith, Katherine Y. Bell, Shubhashini Oza, Giridhar Upadhyaya, Kayla Bauhs, Joey Romo, Brian Hamrick
article en

Abstract

Arsenic and fluoride are co-existing contaminants commonly found in groundwater used for drinking water supply and often exceeding drinking water maximum contaminant levels of 10 µg/L and 4 mg/L, respectively. Adsorption and coagulation followed by filtration are technologies used for treatment. The USA-EPA has identified alumina adsorption as the best available technology. While arsenic removal with activated alumina was not pH-dependent in this study, fluoride removal was pH dependent, with an optimal range between 5.0 - 6.0. A bench study was conducted comparing sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid, and carbon dioxide as alternatives for pH adjustment. While arsenic and fluoride removal were independent of chemicals used for pH adjustment, the costs of pH adjustment with carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid were similar for the site considered, indicating that carbon dioxide can be a safer and better alternative for pH adjustment if a carbon dioxide generating facility is closer to treatment site.

Journal of Environmental ProtectionVol. 16(06)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Fluoride Effects and Removal
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of pH Adjustment Chemical for Arsenic-Fluoride Removal Using Activated Alumina — Samantha J. Smith, Katherine Y. Bell, et al. · Journal of Environmental Protection (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS