Autonomous Decision-Making as a Challenge for Legal Research

In this contribution, the challenges that autonomous decision-making (AI) poses for law is approached by a review of the so-called accountability gap. To get a better understanding of the fundamental problem that economic analysis of law has with autonomous decision-making, different routes for solving the problem are scrutinized. The analysis shows that the toolbox of Law and Economics does not yet provide a clear answer. Doctrinal law can also give no conclusive answers. Instead, this contribution proposes taking a closer look into legal history. The recourse to legal history can neither replace theory, nor can legal rules from the past be transplanted to the present. Yet, a look into legal history can provide fresh ideas on how to deal effectively with the challenges of autonomous decision-making.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics JITE
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1628/jite-2025-0026
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Autonomous Decision-Making as a Challenge for Legal Research

Klaus Heine
1 citations
Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics JITE
Artificial Intelligence in Law
8.52
article

Autonomous Decision-Making as a Challenge for Legal Research

Klaus Heine
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this contribution, the challenges that autonomous decision-making (AI) poses for law is approached by a review of the so-called accountability gap. To get a better understanding of the fundamental problem that economic analysis of law has with autonomous decision-making, different routes for solving the problem are scrutinized. The analysis shows that the toolbox of Law and Economics does not yet provide a clear answer. Doctrinal law can also give no conclusive answers. Instead, this contribution proposes taking a closer look into legal history. The recourse to legal history can neither replace theory, nor can legal rules from the past be transplanted to the present. Yet, a look into legal history can provide fresh ideas on how to deal effectively with the challenges of autonomous decision-making.

Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics JITEVol. 181(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Artificial Intelligence in Law
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.