Earning its Keep

Abstract This article suggests a framework for assessing legitimacy in the particularly volatile context within which the Special Criminal Court (SCC or ‘the Court’) for the Central African Republic (CAR) operates. The legitimacy of the SCC will be tested on two levels: the normative level and the sociological level. In terms of key normative legitimacy criteria, namely the establishment as well as the effectiveness of the court, the Court has earned substantial legitimacy to date. With regard to sociological legitimacy, there are indications that the Court has been positively received by the local population. The legitimacy deficits or defects at the SCC are primarily due to unreliable and fluctuating political will, political interference, and inadequate resourcing. However, the fact that the SCC has functioned, met fair trial guarantees, and won the confidence of the local population in spite of these problems lends legitimacy to the Court.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Criminal Justice
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqaf021
Primary Topic
Political Conflict and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Earning its Keep

Mia Swart
Journal of International Criminal Justice
Political Conflict and Governance
article

Earning its Keep

Mia Swart
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article suggests a framework for assessing legitimacy in the particularly volatile context within which the Special Criminal Court (SCC or ‘the Court’) for the Central African Republic (CAR) operates. The legitimacy of the SCC will be tested on two levels: the normative level and the sociological level. In terms of key normative legitimacy criteria, namely the establishment as well as the effectiveness of the court, the Court has earned substantial legitimacy to date. With regard to sociological legitimacy, there are indications that the Court has been positively received by the local population. The legitimacy deficits or defects at the SCC are primarily due to unreliable and fluctuating political will, political interference, and inadequate resourcing. However, the fact that the SCC has functioned, met fair trial guarantees, and won the confidence of the local population in spite of these problems lends legitimacy to the Court.

Journal of International Criminal JusticeVol. 23(1)
University of Sharjah (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Political Conflict and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.