Here, There & Everywhere

Abstract The study of esotericism emerged during the 1990s as a new academic program of research focused on previously-neglected historical traditions in Western culture. During the first decade of the 2000s, it established itself as a new field that was widely (although not exclusively) referred to as “Western esotericism.” But during the 2010s, questions began to be raised about this focus on the occident, leading to the emerging new agenda of creating a “global history of esotericism.” I will argue that the initial proposals in this direction, while undoubtedly inspired by the best of intentions, are unconvincing on a theoretical level and unintendedly Eurocentric. By focusing on “esoteric” practices rather than discourse , the new CAS-E project may have found a way forward that avoids these deficiencies. While its immediate predecessors are weakened by an oppositional logic of mutual exclusion, the CAS-E agenda of global comparativism is perfectly compatible with historical research focused on esotericism in Western culture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Method & Theory in the Study of Religion
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15700682-bja10152
Primary Topic
Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Here, There & Everywhere

Wouter J. Hanegraaff
Method & Theory in the Study of Religion
Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
article

Here, There & Everywhere

Wouter J. Hanegraaff
article en

Abstract

Abstract The study of esotericism emerged during the 1990s as a new academic program of research focused on previously-neglected historical traditions in Western culture. During the first decade of the 2000s, it established itself as a new field that was widely (although not exclusively) referred to as “Western esotericism.” But during the 2010s, questions began to be raised about this focus on the occident, leading to the emerging new agenda of creating a “global history of esotericism.” I will argue that the initial proposals in this direction, while undoubtedly inspired by the best of intentions, are unconvincing on a theoretical level and unintendedly Eurocentric. By focusing on “esoteric” practices rather than discourse , the new CAS-E project may have found a way forward that avoids these deficiencies. While its immediate predecessors are weakened by an oppositional logic of mutual exclusion, the CAS-E agenda of global comparativism is perfectly compatible with historical research focused on esotericism in Western culture.

Method & Theory in the Study of ReligionVol. 37(3)
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Here, There & Everywhere — Wouter J. Hanegraaff · Method & Theory in the Study of Religion (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS