COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENT MOVEMENT IN TIANANMEN 1989 AND INDONESIA 1998 ACCORDING TO COMPARATIVE POLITICAL HISTORY IN THE REVIEW OF ISLAMIC VALUES

This article discusses political comparisons of social and political movements in China, namely the Beijing Tiananmen tragedy in 1989 and the May 1998 tragedy in Indonesia. This analysis is seen from aspects of the country’s government system, political and party system, and the implications of the demonstration results. China is a republic with a communist system, while Indonesia is a democracy with a presidential system. These two countries have different political systems, with China using a party political system, namely the Chinese Communist Party, while Indonesia has a multi-party political system. The data used in this research comes from secondary data, specifically through the historical comparison method, which was collected from various previous literature sources, namely websites, historical archives, and research validation journals. This article uses a social and political movement theory perspective. The research results show differences in social and political movements in China and Indonesia, according to the conclusion of the analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reflektika
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.28944/reflektika.v20i1.2050
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENT MOVEMENT IN TIANANMEN 1989 AND INDONESIA 1998 ACCORDING TO COMPARATIVE POLITICAL HISTORY IN THE REVIEW OF ISLAMIC VALUES

Moch Galang Mochtar
Reflektika
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
article

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE STUDENT MOVEMENT IN TIANANMEN 1989 AND INDONESIA 1998 ACCORDING TO COMPARATIVE POLITICAL HISTORY IN THE REVIEW OF ISLAMIC VALUES

Moch Galang Mochtar
article en

Abstract

This article discusses political comparisons of social and political movements in China, namely the Beijing Tiananmen tragedy in 1989 and the May 1998 tragedy in Indonesia. This analysis is seen from aspects of the country’s government system, political and party system, and the implications of the demonstration results. China is a republic with a communist system, while Indonesia is a democracy with a presidential system. These two countries have different political systems, with China using a party political system, namely the Chinese Communist Party, while Indonesia has a multi-party political system. The data used in this research comes from secondary data, specifically through the historical comparison method, which was collected from various previous literature sources, namely websites, historical archives, and research validation journals. This article uses a social and political movement theory perspective. The research results show differences in social and political movements in China and Indonesia, according to the conclusion of the analysis.

ReflektikaVol. 20(1)
Universitas Airlangga (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Islamic Studies and Radicalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.