Comparative Analysis of Energy Consumption and Carbon Footprint in Automatic Speech Recognition Systems: A Case Study Comparing Whisper and Google Speech-to-Text

This study investigates the energy consumption and carbon footprint of two prominent automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems: OpenAI’s Whisper and Google’s Speech-to-Text API. We evaluate both local and cloud-based speech recognition approaches using a public Kaggle dataset of 20,000 short audio clips in Urdu, utilizing CodeCarbon, PyJoule, and PowerAPI for comprehensive energy profiling. As a result of our analysis, we expose some substantial differences between the two systems in terms of energy efficiency and carbon emissions, with the cloud-based solution showing substantially lower environmental impact despite comparable accuracy. We discuss the implications of these findings for sustainable AI deployment and minimizing the ecological footprint of speech recognition technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cmsf2025010006
Primary Topic
Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Energy Consumption and Carbon Footprint in Automatic Speech Recognition Systems: A Case Study Comparing Whisper and Google Speech-to-Text

Mohamed Kouissi, Mohammed Achkari Begdouri, Jalal El Bahri
2 links
Speech Recognition and Synthesis
article

Comparative Analysis of Energy Consumption and Carbon Footprint in Automatic Speech Recognition Systems: A Case Study Comparing Whisper and Google Speech-to-Text

Mohamed Kouissi, Mohammed Achkari Begdouri, Jalal El Bahri
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the energy consumption and carbon footprint of two prominent automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems: OpenAI’s Whisper and Google’s Speech-to-Text API. We evaluate both local and cloud-based speech recognition approaches using a public Kaggle dataset of 20,000 short audio clips in Urdu, utilizing CodeCarbon, PyJoule, and PowerAPI for comprehensive energy profiling. As a result of our analysis, we expose some substantial differences between the two systems in terms of energy efficiency and carbon emissions, with the cloud-based solution showing substantially lower environmental impact despite comparable accuracy. We discuss the implications of these findings for sustainable AI deployment and minimizing the ecological footprint of speech recognition technologies.

Abdelmalek Essaâdi University (MA)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Speech Recognition and Synthesis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.