Two Versions of the Portrait of a “Person Intensely Conscious”: Notes from the Underground by F. M. Dostoevsky as a Creative Response to Boyhood and Youth by L. N. Tolstoy

The article, contrary to the established tradition of contrasting the character of F. M. Dostoevsky’s novella Notes from Underground and the autobiographical character of L. N. Tolstoy’s stories Boyhood and Youth, proves that they belong to the same type of dreamer, first presented in Dostoevsky’s story “White Nights.” The most significant difference between them lies in the contrast of their inherent worldviews: Nikolenka Irtenyev is optimistic and believes in the attainability of the ideal of perfection, while Dostoevsky’s character is in a pessimistic mood. This does not allow him to fight for the embodiment of his potential merits in life.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Two centuries of the Russian classics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22455/2686-7494-2025-7-2-142-175
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two Versions of the Portrait of a “Person Intensely Conscious”: Notes from the Underground by F. M. Dostoevsky as a Creative Response to Boyhood and Youth by L. N. Tolstoy

Igor I. Evlampiev, Inga Yu. Matveeva
1 citations
Two centuries of the Russian classics
Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies
8.93
article

Two Versions of the Portrait of a “Person Intensely Conscious”: Notes from the Underground by F. M. Dostoevsky as a Creative Response to Boyhood and Youth by L. N. Tolstoy

Igor I. Evlampiev, Inga Yu. Matveeva
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The article, contrary to the established tradition of contrasting the character of F. M. Dostoevsky’s novella Notes from Underground and the autobiographical character of L. N. Tolstoy’s stories Boyhood and Youth, proves that they belong to the same type of dreamer, first presented in Dostoevsky’s story “White Nights.” The most significant difference between them lies in the contrast of their inherent worldviews: Nikolenka Irtenyev is optimistic and believes in the attainability of the ideal of perfection, while Dostoevsky’s character is in a pessimistic mood. This does not allow him to fight for the embodiment of his potential merits in life.

Two centuries of the Russian classicsVol. 7(2)
Saint Petersburg State University, Russian Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.