Electrochemical Remediation of Marine Sediments Spiked With Hg and PAHs: Comparison of the Enhancing Agents’ Nature

Real marine sediments dredged from Capo Granitola (CG) (Sicily, Italy) artificially contaminated were treated via an electrokinetic (EK) process. Mercury (Hg) and phenanthrene (PHE) or a mixture of PAHs (to simulate a more complex site) were selected as models of heavy metals and organic hazardous compounds, respectively. The aim of this work was to systematically investigate the effect of different enhancing agents on the removal of both classes of contaminants. Marine sediments were treated using a three‐compartment cell under 1 V cm −1 for 10 days. The usage of different enhancing agents, including deionized water, trisodium N‐(1‐carboxylatoethyl)‐iminodiacetate hydrate (MGDA) as chelating agents, Tween 80 surfactant and hydrogen peroxide, was investigated, to prompt the simultaneous removal of both classes of contaminants. The optimum option for the simultaneous removal was observed using a MGDA and Tween 80 solution as anolyte and MGDA solution as catholyte. These adopted conditions allow to reach the highest removal of Hg up to 22.5% and of PHE up to 62% in the case of the sediments contaminated with Hg and PHE and a total Hg removal of 13% coupled with a total PAHs removal of 45% in the case of sediments spiked with Hg and a mixture of five PAHs. It was observed that the nature of the enhancing agents used as electrolytes and their combination strongly affect the remediation treatment in terms of both distribution into the sediments and the total contaminants’ removal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Chemical Engineering
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/ijce/1707820
Primary Topic
Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Electrochemical Remediation of Marine Sediments Spiked With Hg and PAHs: Comparison of the Enhancing Agents’ Nature

Mario Sprovieri, Claudia Prestigiacomo, Fabio D’Agostino, Federica Proietto et al.
International Journal of Chemical Engineering
Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques
article

Electrochemical Remediation of Marine Sediments Spiked With Hg and PAHs: Comparison of the Enhancing Agents’ Nature

Mario Sprovieri, Claudia Prestigiacomo, Fabio D’Agostino, Federica Proietto, Alessandro Galia, Onofrio Scialdone, Maria Bonsignore
article en

Abstract

Real marine sediments dredged from Capo Granitola (CG) (Sicily, Italy) artificially contaminated were treated via an electrokinetic (EK) process. Mercury (Hg) and phenanthrene (PHE) or a mixture of PAHs (to simulate a more complex site) were selected as models of heavy metals and organic hazardous compounds, respectively. The aim of this work was to systematically investigate the effect of different enhancing agents on the removal of both classes of contaminants. Marine sediments were treated using a three‐compartment cell under 1 V cm −1 for 10 days. The usage of different enhancing agents, including deionized water, trisodium N‐(1‐carboxylatoethyl)‐iminodiacetate hydrate (MGDA) as chelating agents, Tween 80 surfactant and hydrogen peroxide, was investigated, to prompt the simultaneous removal of both classes of contaminants. The optimum option for the simultaneous removal was observed using a MGDA and Tween 80 solution as anolyte and MGDA solution as catholyte. These adopted conditions allow to reach the highest removal of Hg up to 22.5% and of PHE up to 62% in the case of the sediments contaminated with Hg and PHE and a total Hg removal of 13% coupled with a total PAHs removal of 45% in the case of sediments spiked with Hg and a mixture of five PAHs. It was observed that the nature of the enhancing agents used as electrolytes and their combination strongly affect the remediation treatment in terms of both distribution into the sediments and the total contaminants’ removal.

International Journal of Chemical EngineeringVol. 2025(1)
Institute for Coastal Marine Environment (IT), Istituto di Scienze Marine del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (IT), University of Palermo (IT)
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca, Università degli Studi di Palermo
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.