Menopause Myths: A Scale Development Study

This study aimed to develop and validate the Menopause Myths Scale, ensuring its psychometric robustness. The methodological study was conducted between September 1, 2023, and March 1, 2024, using the Introductory Information Form and the Menopause Myths Scale Draft Form for data collection. The scale development process was structured into five key phases: literature review, item pool generation, content validity assessment, pilot administration of the scale, and psychometric analysis. During the content validity stage, the initial 30-item scale draft was evaluated by 17 experts, leading to a Content Validity Index (CVI) score of 0.68. After conducting Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), several items were removed, refining the structure. Through Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), the final version of the scale was established with 13 items across three subscales. The CFA results indicated an acceptable model fit, with the following goodness-of-fit indices: χ²/sd: 3.158; GFI: 0.918; AGFI: 0.878; CFI: 0.938; RMSEA: 0.079; SRMR: 0.063. To assess temporal stability, the test-retest method was employed, demonstrating strong reliability over time (ICC: 0.828; p<0.001). Internal consistency was examined using Cronbach’s Alpha, which was 0.871 for the overall scale, with subscale values ranging between 0.792 and 0.854. Findings confirm that the Menopause Myths Scale is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing women’s beliefs about menopause. This scale contributes to the literature by providing a standardized tool for evaluating prevalent menopause-related myths.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cyprus Turkish Journal of Psychiatry and Psychology
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35365/ctjpp.25.2.04
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Menopause Myths: A Scale Development Study

Funda Erol, Kerime Derya Beydağ
1 citations
Cyprus Turkish Journal of Psychiatry and Psychology
Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
8.93
article

Menopause Myths: A Scale Development Study

Funda Erol, Kerime Derya Beydağ
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and validate the Menopause Myths Scale, ensuring its psychometric robustness. The methodological study was conducted between September 1, 2023, and March 1, 2024, using the Introductory Information Form and the Menopause Myths Scale Draft Form for data collection. The scale development process was structured into five key phases: literature review, item pool generation, content validity assessment, pilot administration of the scale, and psychometric analysis. During the content validity stage, the initial 30-item scale draft was evaluated by 17 experts, leading to a Content Validity Index (CVI) score of 0.68. After conducting Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), several items were removed, refining the structure. Through Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), the final version of the scale was established with 13 items across three subscales. The CFA results indicated an acceptable model fit, with the following goodness-of-fit indices: χ²/sd: 3.158; GFI: 0.918; AGFI: 0.878; CFI: 0.938; RMSEA: 0.079; SRMR: 0.063. To assess temporal stability, the test-retest method was employed, demonstrating strong reliability over time (ICC: 0.828; p<0.001). Internal consistency was examined using Cronbach’s Alpha, which was 0.871 for the overall scale, with subscale values ranging between 0.792 and 0.854. Findings confirm that the Menopause Myths Scale is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing women’s beliefs about menopause. This scale contributes to the literature by providing a standardized tool for evaluating prevalent menopause-related myths.

Cyprus Turkish Journal of Psychiatry and PsychologyVol. 7(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.