Beyond diversity initiatives: Building a community of care in scientific societies

In this Professional Biologist article, we present one such reframing that centers individualized care through structural changes. We argue that psychological and sociological motivations of belonging and social capital in the academy are funda- mental challenges contributing to the cultural problems within STEM fields and are particularly present within professional scientific societies. In support of this argument, we present survey- based data alongside significant literature from the humanities. In this reframing supported by existing organizational culture literature and our survey results, we suggest that scientific societies are uniquely positioned to promote significant cultural change within STEM by focusing on building communities of care along- side their established communities of practice. We further make specific suggestions about how to build these communities of care in ways that will increase buy-in from the historical majority to support and promote the historically excluded without relying on DEIJ initiatives that can often harm more than help (e.g., Leslie 2019 , Burnett and Aguinis 2024 , Robb and Rana 2024 ).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BioScience
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaf065
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Diversity and Career in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond diversity initiatives: Building a community of care in scientific societies

Kathryn Wilsterman, Richelle L. Tanner
1 citations
BioScience
Diversity and Career in Medicine
3.87
article

Beyond diversity initiatives: Building a community of care in scientific societies

Kathryn Wilsterman, Richelle L. Tanner
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this Professional Biologist article, we present one such reframing that centers individualized care through structural changes. We argue that psychological and sociological motivations of belonging and social capital in the academy are funda- mental challenges contributing to the cultural problems within STEM fields and are particularly present within professional scientific societies. In support of this argument, we present survey- based data alongside significant literature from the humanities. In this reframing supported by existing organizational culture literature and our survey results, we suggest that scientific societies are uniquely positioned to promote significant cultural change within STEM by focusing on building communities of care along- side their established communities of practice. We further make specific suggestions about how to build these communities of care in ways that will increase buy-in from the historical majority to support and promote the historically excluded without relying on DEIJ initiatives that can often harm more than help (e.g., Leslie 2019 , Burnett and Aguinis 2024 , Robb and Rana 2024 ).

BioScienceVol. 75(8)
Chapman University (US), Colorado State University (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Diversity and Career in Medicine
3.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Beyond diversity initiatives: Building a community of care in scientific societies — Kathryn Wilsterman, Richelle L. Tanner · BioScience (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS